2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2015.2435258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Governor Deadband on Frequency Response of the U.S. Eastern Interconnection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a pessimistic case, generation loss of up to 851 MW will not cause any primary frequency response because of presence of deadband. In that case, the responsibility of correcting the system frequency would ultimately rest with the slow-acting secondary frequency controllers and thus frequency response would deteriorate [2].…”
Section: B Estimating Primary Frequency Reserve Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in a pessimistic case, generation loss of up to 851 MW will not cause any primary frequency response because of presence of deadband. In that case, the responsibility of correcting the system frequency would ultimately rest with the slow-acting secondary frequency controllers and thus frequency response would deteriorate [2].…”
Section: B Estimating Primary Frequency Reserve Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted in one study that more than 50% plants in North America have inadequate information about turbine-governor time constants and other important parameters [1]. As a result, the simulated frequency response differs from the actual response following disturbances [2]. The primary frequency response (PFR) of the utilities may reduce because of diminishing inertia due to penetration of non-synchronous type generation into the system, lesser number of generators participating in frequency control, and ageing governor systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 While subject to some events like generator tripping and load variation, power system responds according to its inherent characteristic that all connected equipment operate in a closed-loop under droop control when the regulation of generators in open-loop is not applied. 17 However, the time cost is fairly high for a large-scale grid with detailed and complicated model. It accords with the practical situation, but more variables are brought into computation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%