2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of glyphosate on soil microbial biomass and respiration: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further soil microbial properties were also measured (community structure measured by ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME) analysis and microbial biomass K), and K fractions (exchangeable and nonexchangeable) were measured periodically. There were no significant effects of repeated glyphosate application on soil microbial structure (EL-FAME), functional diversity (EL-FAME), or microbial biomass K. Glyphosate was also found to not reduce exchangeable K (putatively available to plants) or to affect nonexchangeable K. A meta-analysis indicates that there is no observable trend in the literature for soil microbial biomass or respiration effects linked to glyphosate, other than transient effects after initial exposure [37]. The effects observed in the N-transformation study with AMPA at the 2 highest rates (320 mg/kg dry soil and 640 mg/kg dry soil), although not <25% at the final measurement day 56, should be placed into context with the application rates for glyphosate in the field.…”
Section: Soil Microbial Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Further soil microbial properties were also measured (community structure measured by ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME) analysis and microbial biomass K), and K fractions (exchangeable and nonexchangeable) were measured periodically. There were no significant effects of repeated glyphosate application on soil microbial structure (EL-FAME), functional diversity (EL-FAME), or microbial biomass K. Glyphosate was also found to not reduce exchangeable K (putatively available to plants) or to affect nonexchangeable K. A meta-analysis indicates that there is no observable trend in the literature for soil microbial biomass or respiration effects linked to glyphosate, other than transient effects after initial exposure [37]. The effects observed in the N-transformation study with AMPA at the 2 highest rates (320 mg/kg dry soil and 640 mg/kg dry soil), although not <25% at the final measurement day 56, should be placed into context with the application rates for glyphosate in the field.…”
Section: Soil Microbial Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…An additional boosted regression tree (BRT) analysis was performed to rank the importance of the explanatory variables and address non-linearity and factor interactions (Elith et al, 2008). The combination between BRT and mixed-effect model has been used in a number of meta-analyses (Rose et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Boosted Regression Tree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to conclusive determination of glyphosate effect on microbial communities of GR crops is to carefully compare glyphosate sprayed and non-sprayed treatments within an agronomic context. Farming systems, soil factors, crop varieties, glyphosate legacy and application rates can all impact the behavior of glyphosate and its interaction with the crop and soil microbiome [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%