2016
DOI: 10.21276/ijmrp.2016.2.6.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Glycemic Control on Depression among Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Abstract: Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have demonstrated rates of psychological distress, particularly depression tend to be higher than the general population, but are usually comparable to those reported in individuals with other chronic diseases. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and determinants, particularly the glycemic control, of depression in patients with T2DM attending family medicine and diabetic clinics in Makkah MOH hospitals and primary care centers. Subjects and Methods: A cross-se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prevalence rate falls in the middle of the rates’ range that has been reported by previous studies, from 14.5% 36 to 64%. 37 It goes along with our previous studies on Saudi population with diabetes 32 , 38 and with large meta-analysis in 2001 that found the prevalence of co morbid depression was significantly higher in clinical (32%) than in community (20%) samples, and by using self-report questionnaires (31%) than by standardized diagnostic interviews (11%). 33 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This prevalence rate falls in the middle of the rates’ range that has been reported by previous studies, from 14.5% 36 to 64%. 37 It goes along with our previous studies on Saudi population with diabetes 32 , 38 and with large meta-analysis in 2001 that found the prevalence of co morbid depression was significantly higher in clinical (32%) than in community (20%) samples, and by using self-report questionnaires (31%) than by standardized diagnostic interviews (11%). 33 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%