Airborne-particle abrasion before cementation of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns minimally improved the tensile strength. Both the failure types and the tensile strength values of adhesively luted glass ceramic crowns showed superior results to adhesively cemented polymeric ones. Although the tensile strength results were low, crowns cemented with RXU showed, after aging, the highest tensile strength of all other tested groups. Purpose. To assess the tensile strength of polymeric crowns following different conditioning protocols; luted with self-adhesive cements to dental abutments and with conventional resin cements.
Material and methods.Human teeth were prepared for all crowns and divided into 13 groups (N=312, n=24 per group). Polymeric crowns were CAD/CAM fabricated, and divided into 3 groups depending on different surface conditioning methods: A) No treatment, B) airborne particle abrasion with 50 µm alumina, and C) airborne-particle abrasion with 110 µm alumina.Thereafter, the crowns were luted on dentin abutments with the following cements: 1) RXU (RelyX Unicem, self-adhesive), 2) GCM (G-Cem, self-adhesive), 3) ACG (artCem GI, conventional), and 4) VAR (Variolink II, conventional). Glass ceramic crowns milled and cemented with dual-polymerized resin cement (Variolink II) acted as the control group. The tensile strength was measured initially (n=12) and after aging by mechanical thermocycling loading (1 200 000 cycles, 49 N, 5°C to 50°C) (n=12). The tensile strength (MPa) of all crowns was determined by the pull-off test (Zwick/Roell Z010; Ulm, Germany, 1mm/min).19228-orig2-figs-edits 2 Subsequently, the failure types were classified. Data were analyzed with 2-way and 1-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffé test and t-test (α=.05).