Impact of Global Brand Chief Marketing Officers’ Corporate Social Responsibility and Sociopolitical Activism Communication on Twitter

Abstract

Chief marketing officers (CMOs) engage with their stakeholders on social media platforms with the intention to create a digital impact. CMO communication on societal issues is understudied despite heightened global attention to brands’ social practices. This poses three research questions: (1) How central is corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sociopolitical activism in the communication of global brands’ CMOs? (2) Does CMOs’ communication about CSR or sociopolitical activism have a digital impact? and (3) How do brand origin (i.e., geographic location of headquarters [HQ]) and CMO nationality (U.S. vs. non-U.S.) moderate the CSR/sociopolitical activism−digital communication impact? Drawing on expectancy violation theory, this research (Ntweets = 17,468 over NCMOs=81) finds that CMOs rarely publish CSR or sociopolitical activism communication on Twitter (5.3% and 3.2%) and demonstrates a higher digital impact of retweets for CSR and a lower impact for sociopolitical activism tweets than regular communication. Furthermore, non-U.S. HQ and CMO nationality strengthen the positive effect of CSR communication and weaken the negative effect of sociopolitical activism communication.

Compassionate Global Brand: A Bridge Between Brand Globalness and Brand Love for Sustainable Brands

“…In order to create sustained Global Brand Compassion and promote the growth and sustainability of MSMEs in the local business environment, brands must uphold the integrity and quality that customers trust in them. The findings of this investigation align with earlier studies by (Nie &;Wang, 2021), (Garcia, 2021), (Swoboda &;Sinning, 2021), (Özturan &;Grinstein, 2022) which demonstrated that Global Brand Compassion is positively and significantly impacted by Brand Globalness.…”

Physical and Digital Privacy: How Developed and Developing Countries Differ in Both Vulnerability and Protection

“…Conversely, the ways in which consumers engage in digital spaces can blur into their physical lives. Consider how social media and the information shared using those platforms translate into not only consumption decisions and purchases but also political preferences and voting behavior (Özturan and Grinstein 2022). A consumer's digital persona can shape the news they consume, the music they play, and even the friends with whom they interact in the physical world.…”

Public relations, activism, and the culture of assertion: The case of Blackrock’s Larry Fink and the letter to the CEOs

“…While some critical scholars take this dialogic orientation as a given, claiming that organizations have a role to play in positively shaping the world (Logan, 2021; Özturan and Grinstein, 2022) and do so through using public relations in a seemingly dialogic way with their stakeholders (Kent and Taylor, 2002), other scholars (Cizek and Logan, 2018; Quichocho and St John, 2021; Stoker, 2020) note that this conceptualization of public relations is increasingly out of step with the practice of PR. Their challenge to dialogic communication models is grounded in the observation that modern societies, at least in their public spheres, are increasingly suffused with contestations that undermine metanarratives that customarily serve as the underpinnings for dialogic communication (Holtzhausen, 2000; Sen, 2023; Zompetti and Moffitt, 2008).…”