2023
DOI: 10.1111/jfs.13057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of gas ultrafine bubbles on the efficacy of antimicrobials for eliminating fresh and aged Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on dairy processing surfaces

Abstract: Ultrafine bubbles (UFB) are a novel concept that has the potential to enhance the potency of antimicrobials to eliminate biofilms. This study investigated the impact of incorporating gas (air, CO2, and N2) UFB on the potency of chlorine (Cl2; 50, 100, and 200 ppm) and peracetic acid (PAA; 20, 40, and 80 ppm) antimicrobial (AM) solutions against fresh (3 days) and aged (30 days) Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on polypropylene, silicone, and stainless steel surfaces. Listeria monocytogenes biofilms were statica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work by our research group, Singh et al (2021) evaluated the impact of gas UFB [denoted as micro‐nano‐bubbles (MNB)] on the efficacy of commonly used AM in the food industry and demonstrated the incorporation of CO 2 UFB improved the potency of 200 ppm chlorine (Cl 2 ) and 28.4 ppm peracetic acid (PAA) solutions against E. coli O157: H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in growth media compared to these AM solutions without UFB. Similarly, Unger et al (2023) evaluated the impact of UFB on the efficacy of AM against fresh and aged L. monocytogenes biofilms on various processing surfaces and discovered that the incorporation of air, CO 2 , and N 2 UFB in Cl 2 (50, 100, and 200 ppm) and PAA (20, 40, and 80 ppm) AM solutions resulted in significantly increased log reductions of fresh and aged L. monocytogenes biofilms on polypropylene and stainless‐steel surfaces compared with AM solutions without UFB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In previous work by our research group, Singh et al (2021) evaluated the impact of gas UFB [denoted as micro‐nano‐bubbles (MNB)] on the efficacy of commonly used AM in the food industry and demonstrated the incorporation of CO 2 UFB improved the potency of 200 ppm chlorine (Cl 2 ) and 28.4 ppm peracetic acid (PAA) solutions against E. coli O157: H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in growth media compared to these AM solutions without UFB. Similarly, Unger et al (2023) evaluated the impact of UFB on the efficacy of AM against fresh and aged L. monocytogenes biofilms on various processing surfaces and discovered that the incorporation of air, CO 2 , and N 2 UFB in Cl 2 (50, 100, and 200 ppm) and PAA (20, 40, and 80 ppm) AM solutions resulted in significantly increased log reductions of fresh and aged L. monocytogenes biofilms on polypropylene and stainless‐steel surfaces compared with AM solutions without UFB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A three‐strain E. coli master inoculum cocktail was then prepared by mixing equal proportions of freshly grown cultures, and biofilm were developed on polypropylene, silicone, and stainless steel coupons (7.62 × 2.54 cm 2 ) through static incubation at 25°C for 3 or 30 days by submerging in 40 mL E. coli inoculated BHI broth (9.44 ± 0.07 log CFU/mL) as described by Unger et al (2023). During biofilm development, 20 mL of inoculated BHI broth was replaced by fresh BHI broth after 36 h or every 5 days of incubation for 3‐ and 30‐day biofilms, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations