Impact of fly ash content and fly ash transportation distance on embodied greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption in concrete

Abstract

Background, aim and scope Fly ash, a by-product of coalfired power stations, is substituted for Portland cement to improve the properties of concrete and reduce the embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Much of the world's fly ash is currently disposed of as a waste product. While replacing some Portland cement with fly ash can reduce production costs and the embodied emissions of concrete, the relationship between fly ash content and embodied GHG emissions in concrete has not been quantified. The impact of fly ash content on embodied water is also unknown. Furthermore, it is not known whether a global trade in fly ash for use in concrete is feasible from a carbon balance perspective, or if transport over long distances would eliminate any CO 2 savings. This paper aims to quantify GHG emissions and water embodied in concrete ( f ′ c =32 MPa) as a function of fly ash content and to determine the critical fly ash transportation distance, beyond which use of fly ash in concrete increases embodied GHG emissions. Materials and methods This paper used previously published and reported data for GHG emissions and water usage in cement production, quarries, transportation and concrete batching to quantify the embodied GHG emissions (CO 2 -equivalent) and water in concrete and the critical transportation distance for fly ash. Results Fly ash content alone is not a good indicator of embodied emissions in concrete; increasing fly ash content only reduces embodied emissions when there is a corresponding reduction in the mass of Portland cement used. The total embodied GHG emissions in concrete (GHG concrete , kg CO 2 -equivalent m −3 ) can be determined from the mass of Portland cement used (mass cement , t m −3 ): GHG concrete =66+790.7 mass cement . This equation can be used to determine the reduction in Portland cement required to meet specific GHG emissions targets for concrete, if the Portland cement is replaced by fly ash sourced within 100 km of a concrete batching plant. Fly ash content has little effect on embodied water, which was 2.7-4.1 m 3 water per cubic metre of concrete. Discussion Fly ash can be transported more than 11,000 km by articulated truck, 47,000 km by rail and 54,000 km by sea and still result in a net reduction in GHG emissions if used to replace Portland cement in concrete. At least 70% of GHG emissions embodied in concrete were due to cement production, even for fly ash content as high as 40%. Aggregate production accounted for 17-25% of embodied GHG emissions. While transport of concrete from batching plant to site represented only 3-5% of GHG emissions, this distance is subject to wide variability and hence can be a source of variation in total embodied GHG emissions. Water used in quarrying aggregate is both the largest and the most variable quantity of water used in concrete production, and accounted for at least 89% of water consumption for all mix designs considered in this study. Conclusions While this study used values applicable to Brisbane, Australia, results are presented in a gener...

A Materials Life Cycle Assessment of a Net-Zero Energy Building

“…Extrapolating this data in relation to the 40% flyash reduction assumed for the CSL results in an overall 25% reduction in energy consumption for the production of the concrete. According to published reports and assumed in this study, production energy associated with the increase of flyash percentage in cement does not account for the production of flyash because it is considered a waste by-product [44][45][46][47]. With respect to GWP of flyash replacement in cement, we assumed an emission factors for cement to be 0.82 ton CO 2 /ton of cement and for flyash to be 0.027 ton CO 2 /ton [38].…”

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of blended cement concrete including carbonation and durability

“…It is known that the mix design can be adjusted in order to avoid changes in the properties of blended cement concrete. The variation in the mass of raw materials in the mix design can lead to differences in GHG emissions of less than 0.2%, and there is only a negligible effect on embodied water (O'Brien et al 2009), hence this study will assume the same mix design ( Table 1). …”

Evaluating the Link between Low Carbon Reductions Strategies and Its Performance in the Context of Climate Change: A Carbon Footprint of a Wood-Frame Residential Building in Quebec, Canada

“…O'Brien [51] proposed that despite if FA is transported up to 10,000 km by truck, almost 50,000 km by rail and 55,000 km by sea for replacing cement in concrete, the net CFP will still be lower than that of tradtional concrete. Other type by-products offer flexible solutions, as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) could be used either as a constituent of concrete or as a replacement of polystyrene core [52].…”