2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of fluconazole susceptibility on the outcome of patients with candidaemia: data from a population-based surveillance

Abstract: High fluconazole MIC values did not negatively impact outcome of patients with candidaemia treated with fluconazole. No effect of PK/PD targets on the risk of clinical failure was found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, in a study by Fernández-Ruiz and colleagues (9) of 249 patients with candidemia (including 23 infected with C. glabrata), no specific AUC/MIC threshold was significantly associated with fluconazole failure, defined as a composite of 30-day death and/or persistent candidemia, in multivariate analyses. The study did not assess the impact of fluconazole dose on outcomes (9). Therefore, our study provides novel data regarding the relationship between various measures of fluconazole exposure and outcomes in C. glabrata fungemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, in a study by Fernández-Ruiz and colleagues (9) of 249 patients with candidemia (including 23 infected with C. glabrata), no specific AUC/MIC threshold was significantly associated with fluconazole failure, defined as a composite of 30-day death and/or persistent candidemia, in multivariate analyses. The study did not assess the impact of fluconazole dose on outcomes (9). Therefore, our study provides novel data regarding the relationship between various measures of fluconazole exposure and outcomes in C. glabrata fungemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This imprecision in AUC estimates might have contributed to our findings. This is a limitation shared by other retrospective analyses of fluconazole pharmacodynamics (8,9,(13)(14)(15). Another limitation of our study is that, since the included patients were treated between 2002 and 2011, improvements in supportive care and treatment of comorbid conditions may limit the applicability of our results to present-day practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While these studies allow more robust examination of patients with invasive infections, they continued to suffer from limitations similar to those of the Rex et al data set, that is, they included small (Ͻ15%) numbers of isolates with MICs in the SDD category, they grouped all Candida species together (thus precluding analysis of individual species, such as C. glabrata, for example), and they included patients treated with a wide range of doses (12). Similarly, to explore the role of azole pharmacodynamics, several investigators have investigated correlations between AUC/MIC (or dose/MIC) and outcome in patients with candidemia (Table 2) (10,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). These studies were unable to identify a definitive AUC/MIC or dose/MIC threshold that correlates with treatment success for all patients.…”
Section: Fluconazole Susceptibility and Treatment Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were unable to identify a definitive AUC/MIC or dose/MIC threshold that correlates with treatment success for all patients. Notably, few studies used adjusted analyses to account for differences in severity of illness (18)(19)(20). This is an important distinction, as candidemia generally occurs in patients with multiple comorbidities that can significantly influence patient outcomes (21).…”
Section: Fluconazole Susceptibility and Treatment Successmentioning
confidence: 99%