Abstract:Objective. To determine whether a flipped classroom design would improve student performance and perceptions of the learning experience compared to traditional lecture course design in a required pharmacotherapy course for second-year pharmacy students. Design. Students viewed short online videos about the foundational concepts and answered selfassessment questions prior to face-to-face sessions involving patient case discussions. Assessment. Pretest/posttest and precourse/postcourse surveys evaluated students… Show more
“…5 Existing literature, although limited, suggests that flipping a class requires considerably more faculty time and resources in order to be effectively delivered. 5,7 McLaughlin and colleagues estimated that in order to "flip" a class, a professor would have to invest 127% more time for course development and management. After initial development, the same group found that after the initial development time, the flipped classroom requires 57% more time to maintain compared to a lecture course.…”
Objective. To examine the evidence of the effectiveness of flipped classroom compared to traditional lecture. Methods. Experimental and observational studies were included and obtained through searches of PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Google Scholar. Publications from January 1, 2000 through July 1, 2017 were included. Studies were eligible for this research if: (a) the study compared student outcomes using flipped classroom versus lecture and (b) at least one outcome measure was final examination score or final course score. This analysis used a random effects model with weighted mean difference (WMD) as the outcome. Results. Six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and five were included in the quantitative synthesis. To date, there has only been one prospective randomized comparison of flipped classroom to lecture in student pharmacist education. When comparing final examination scores, there was no significant difference between flipped classroom and lecture based instruction. Only two studies examined the effect of flipped classroom compared to lecture on final course score. This analysis also found no significant difference. Conclusion. Despite a lack of prospective randomized studies, findings from this meta-analysis suggest that flipped classroom may be associated with minimal gains in student knowledge compared to lecture. These findings are important because previous research has estimated that the flipped classroom requires more time to develop and implement. Future studies using prospective randomized designs need to be conducted before widespread adoption.
“…5 Existing literature, although limited, suggests that flipping a class requires considerably more faculty time and resources in order to be effectively delivered. 5,7 McLaughlin and colleagues estimated that in order to "flip" a class, a professor would have to invest 127% more time for course development and management. After initial development, the same group found that after the initial development time, the flipped classroom requires 57% more time to maintain compared to a lecture course.…”
Objective. To examine the evidence of the effectiveness of flipped classroom compared to traditional lecture. Methods. Experimental and observational studies were included and obtained through searches of PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Google Scholar. Publications from January 1, 2000 through July 1, 2017 were included. Studies were eligible for this research if: (a) the study compared student outcomes using flipped classroom versus lecture and (b) at least one outcome measure was final examination score or final course score. This analysis used a random effects model with weighted mean difference (WMD) as the outcome. Results. Six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and five were included in the quantitative synthesis. To date, there has only been one prospective randomized comparison of flipped classroom to lecture in student pharmacist education. When comparing final examination scores, there was no significant difference between flipped classroom and lecture based instruction. Only two studies examined the effect of flipped classroom compared to lecture on final course score. This analysis also found no significant difference. Conclusion. Despite a lack of prospective randomized studies, findings from this meta-analysis suggest that flipped classroom may be associated with minimal gains in student knowledge compared to lecture. These findings are important because previous research has estimated that the flipped classroom requires more time to develop and implement. Future studies using prospective randomized designs need to be conducted before widespread adoption.
“…6 Similar results have been established from various studies assessing the impact of flipped educational and assessment models in science and pharmacy undergraduate courses worldwide. 4,7,[10][11][12][13] Despite this growing interest in the flipped classroom approach and the promising results obtained in terms of students' performance and satisfaction in the pharmacy curriculum, 4,[11][12][13] this model has not…”
Section: A J P E a C C E P T E D D R A F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time in class is, thus, expended in meaningful discussions, problem solving, and facilitating collaboration among students. 4 Another recent trend comprises the "flipped exam" or "flipped assessment," where students tend to construct their own well-reasoned examinations/assessments utilizing intellectual educational tools provided beforehand. Flipped exams anticipate finding out not only what students know, but also entice thinking in novel ways far from just rehearsing memorized material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] "Flipped classrooms" have been an innovation much talked about recently and increasingly embraced by academics around the world. [4][5][6] In "flipped learning," the traditional teaching model is rotated, and the classroom hosts learners who have already engaged with prior study material via online lectures and pre-work activities. The time in class is, thus, expended in meaningful discussions, problem solving, and facilitating collaboration among students.…”
Objective. To assess final-year pharmacy students' performance and evaluate their experience in a "flipped exam" versus a "traditional exam" for an advanced clinical pharmacy course.Methods. The students devised the multiple choice questions that comprised the flipped exam. Biggs revised 2-factor Study Process Questionnaire was administered before and after the exam to assess any possible changes in the students' perceptions of their level of engagement in the learning process. Focus groups discussions were also conducted to further gauge the students' feedback and insights into the flipped examination experience.Results. Changes in mean total study process scores, at the deep and surface levels of learning, were statistically significant. The flipped exam experience was enjoyable, facilitated a less-stressful learning environment, and improved the students' learning satisfaction, knowledge, and assessment marks.
Conclusion. The flipped exam model represents an innovative instructional approach that, ifpedagogically designed and implemented, could potentially bring about significant educational gains.
“…This approach has been cited in health professional programs such as medicine, nursing, dentistry, and pharmacy [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Studies in these fields focus on student perception, satisfaction, and some on academic test scores.…”
Section: The Flipped Classroom In Health Professional Schoolsmentioning
Abstract:The flipped classroom is an approach to incorporate active learning that is being used in secondary education, higher education, and professional schools. This study investigates its impact on student learning and confidence in a professional degree program course. A quasi-experimental study was conducted to evaluate pharmacy students enrolled in a semester-long didactic traditional classroom course compared to students learning the same material using a flipped model through online self-study modules in a hands-on experiential learning course. Before and after each learning experience, students of each group completed a 16-item knowledge assessment on four topic areas and rated their level of confidence with each topic area on a Likert scale. There was a significant difference in knowledge with students in the traditional course scoring higher than students using flipped approach in the experiential course. Furthermore, the flipped experiential course students did not improve assessment scores from pre-test to post-test. For confidence rating, the traditional course group ranked confidence higher than the flipped experiential group for all topics. These findings challenge the notion that the flipped model using self-study in an experiential setting can be a substitution for didactic delivery of pharmacy education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.