Impact of financial support and focussed group counselling on treatment abandonment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Experience over 22 years from North India

Abstract

Objectives: Efforts are being made worldwide to prevent abandonment in children with leukaemia. The study aimed to determine changes in treatment refusal, treatment abandonment rates, and its reasons in response to financial support and focussed group counselling.Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted at paediatric haematologyoncology unit, King George's Medical University, Lucknow among children <18 years admitted with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from 1995 to 2017. Study divided into three periods: Phase ): Financial, social support with group counselling. Phase 3-subdivided into 3a: group counselling and 3b: intensified group counselling. Results: Number of children registered for treatment during phase 1, 2, 3a, 3b: 176, 200, 360, and 305. Treatment refusal decreased significantly over time: 21% vs 14.5%vs 12.5% vs 5.9% (P < 0.001), especially during phase 3b. Although no change was found in treatment abandonment during phase 2, abandonment significantly reduced in phase 3a (20.3%) as compared with phase 1 (30.2%), with the proportion of children abandoning, due to financial constraints, declining. Abandonment further reduced in phase 3b vs phase 3a (11.1% vs 20.3%) (P = 0.001). After adjusting for other variables, abandonment was found to decrease independently in phase3 (a, b) as compared with phase 1 (P1 = 0.017, P2 = 0.007). Conclusions:Although helpful, financial assistance unaccompanied by counselling may be insufficient to bring a radical change. Hence, parental counselling, emphasising on treatment adherence and the aftermaths of treatment abandonment, is indispensable for preventing abandonment in semi-literate populations.

Treatment of Ph-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults with an Affordable Outpatient Pediatric Regimen

“…While less is known about treatment abandonment in adults, similar rates of 20-30% have been reported in children treated in public institutions in LMICs including Central America and Asia, are related to economic constraints, and can be successfully decreased to < 10% with a combination of financial support, prospective tracking, counseling, and education. [28][29][30][31][32] At the patient level, we are performing a mixedmethods study to account for the access and adherence phenomenon in our region to improve our follow-up strategy.…”

How ‘significant others’ may support parents with decision‐making about their child’s cancer care: An integrative literature review

“…In many of the studies, this support stemmed from other families of children with cancer (Alam & Kumar, 2019;Cohen et al, 2017;Gage, 2013;Huang et al, 2008;H-Yazdi & Meadows, 2021;Mostert et al, 2014;Renner & McGill, 2016;Sitaresmi et al, 2010;Yeh et al, 1999). However, this was not exclusively the case and some parents also sought information from family and friends who had related experience (H-Yazdi & Meadows, 2021;Jong et al, 2020;Sitaresmi et al, 2010).…”

How I Treat Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in India

“…Experience from pediatric ALL shows that it is possible to achieve this, even in a governmental setup. [26][27][28]…”