2021
DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) (J.E. Smith) on small-scale maize farmers and its control strategies in the Limpopo province, South Africa

Abstract: South Africa experienced major outbreaks of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), causing direct damage by feeding on both vegetative and reproductive parts of host plant. The study was conducted to determine the level of impact of fall armyworm on small-scale maize famers after the outbreak of fall armyworm and their control strategies at Ga-Mashashane and Mankweng villages in the Limpopo province. Semi-structured questionnaire was designed to gather information on the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larval stage duration differed based on the host plant in which it ranged from 14 to 19.5 days and this in consistent with those of Igyuve et al (2018), Lamsal et al (2020), ELSheikh et al,) 2021( and Mohamed et al )2021).Further, the host plant type affected on the larval duration and changed in each specie which could be the reasons of crop damage as mentioned byAgboyi et al (2019). On tomato and pepper fruits, the duration of larvae found to be longer than other host plants which are in consistent with that found byMakgoba et al (2021) andWu Li-hong et al (2021). The pupal duration did not differ on all host plants with duration less than 8 days which was closed to that reported by Nandita and Sonali (2020) but not closed to that reported bySharanabasappa et al (2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The larval stage duration differed based on the host plant in which it ranged from 14 to 19.5 days and this in consistent with those of Igyuve et al (2018), Lamsal et al (2020), ELSheikh et al,) 2021( and Mohamed et al )2021).Further, the host plant type affected on the larval duration and changed in each specie which could be the reasons of crop damage as mentioned byAgboyi et al (2019). On tomato and pepper fruits, the duration of larvae found to be longer than other host plants which are in consistent with that found byMakgoba et al (2021) andWu Li-hong et al (2021). The pupal duration did not differ on all host plants with duration less than 8 days which was closed to that reported by Nandita and Sonali (2020) but not closed to that reported bySharanabasappa et al (2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nonetheless, this higher attack seen in the intercropping treatment was not carried over to the maize reproductive stage, which was somewhat expected. Previous studies have shown that S. frugiperda indeed causes significantly more damage to young leaves than to the ears, suggesting a higher susceptibility of this crop during the 40 days after sowing 23,24 . This may be due to the fact that adults of S. frugiperda seem to prefer to oviposit on younger maize plants as opposed to plants already in the reproductive stage 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies have shown that S. frugiperda indeed causes significantly more damage to young leaves than to the ears, suggesting a higher susceptibility of this crop during the 40 days after sowing. 23,24 This may be due to the fact that adults of S. frugiperda seem to prefer to oviposit on younger maize plants as opposed to plants already in the reproductive stage. 25 Furthermore, the maize and brachiaria phenology can also play an important role in the attraction and survival of S.frugiperda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous knowledge is a set of practices and skills acquired by local people through the accumulation of experience, informal experiments and an understanding of their environment [39]. Since the arrival of the FAW in Africa [1], its control has often been done through chemical control methods [8]. However, due to the unaffordability of chemical products and their adverse environmental effects, indigenous management options are also used by farmers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its arrival, the FAW has caused substantial losses in the cereal value chain. For instance, smallholder farmers have been heavily impacted [8]. In Africa, maize yield losses due to the FAW are estimated at 21-53% [7], accounting for about $16 billion in losses annually [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%