2014
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Facial Fractures and Intracranial Injuries on Hospitalization Outcomes Following Firearm Injuries

Abstract: AND RELEVANCE Occurrence of intracranial injuries was an independent risk factor for poor outcomes. Teaching hospitals had higher mortality rates but also treated more complex cases than nonteaching hospitals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data may underestimate the total number of injuries resulting from penetrating neck trauma involving the carotid artery or jugular vein or injuries from hanging and strangulation as many of these patients are dead on arrival to the ED 12 or have other predominate injuries. The prevalence of facial fractures is lower than reported by Allareddy et al 6 ; in their analysis of the 2007 NEDS database, they identified craniofacial fractures coded in any of the 15 diagnostic columns provided and did not exclude intracranial injuries. However, the present report performed detailed analysis only of primary injuries attributed to the head, face, or neck to ensure regression results predicting mortality and admission could be attributed solely to head and neck injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data may underestimate the total number of injuries resulting from penetrating neck trauma involving the carotid artery or jugular vein or injuries from hanging and strangulation as many of these patients are dead on arrival to the ED 12 or have other predominate injuries. The prevalence of facial fractures is lower than reported by Allareddy et al 6 ; in their analysis of the 2007 NEDS database, they identified craniofacial fractures coded in any of the 15 diagnostic columns provided and did not exclude intracranial injuries. However, the present report performed detailed analysis only of primary injuries attributed to the head, face, or neck to ensure regression results predicting mortality and admission could be attributed solely to head and neck injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recent estimates suggest the burden of trauma may be significantly greater; Allareddy et al identified 407,157 facial fracture-related ED visits in the United States in 2007, the majority of which were nasal fractures and infrequently resulted in admission (5). Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the same group identified 13,090 firearm injuries involving facial or skull fractures between 2003 and 2010 (6). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Studies have reported interpersonal violence as the etiology of 11-52% of all mandibular and facial fractures. 2,4,5,8,9,[23][24][25] The differences between these studies are mostly attributable to the differences in study settings including inpatient versus outpatient, age group of the patients, and country and region in which each study was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Interpersonal violence and assault have been known as frequent mechanisms of facial fractures and several studies have identified the craniofacial region as the most common body part injured during interpersonal violence. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Facial fractures have a special place among injuries as the facial skeleton has a complex structure which protects the eyes, forms the airway, and is the entrance to the alimentary canal. It has also been shown that facial fractures are frequently accompanied by severe injuries of other body parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that these encompass trauma to soft and neurological tissue, the bone and sense organs, lead to create a situation where much is compromised, not only for the practitioner, but also for the patient´s quality of life (3). In the U.S., it has been reported that firearm injuries to facial and intracranial structures represent 15% of all hospitalizations due these type of impacts (4). In a local, Mexican context, studies have reported that firearm injuries represent up to 20% of all impacts in hospitalized settings (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%