2015
DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2014.0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of eye detection error on face recognition performance

Abstract: The locations of the eyes are the most commonly used features to perform face normalization (i. e., alignment of facial features), which is an essential preprocessing stage of many face recognition systems. In this paper, we study the sensitivity of open source implementations of five face recognition algorithms to misalignment caused by eye localization errors. We investigate the ambiguity in location of the eyes by comparing the difference between two independent manual eye annotations. We also study the err… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected these parameters to be well outside of the error range of a reasonable (frontal face) eye detector. Alignment errors of these magnitudes have been shown to highly influence the performance of many traditional face recognition algorithms [34].…”
Section: Handling Mis-aligned Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected these parameters to be well outside of the error range of a reasonable (frontal face) eye detector. Alignment errors of these magnitudes have been shown to highly influence the performance of many traditional face recognition algorithms [34].…”
Section: Handling Mis-aligned Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in [5,22], face recognition works better on aligned faces. Therefore, for most face processing tasks, the first step is to align the face based on facial landmarks in order to extract features from it [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, we employed the VGG-face CNN model, with two major contributions:  The proposed method involves no preprocessing steps, i.e., images are only resized to the standard size of VGG-model input without any form of registration. Registration steps, usually used in the literature [13,[17][18][19], may not only involve alignment errors [20,21], but also make the method less robust, time consuming, and sensitive to the success of the registration step.  The extracted features using the transfer learning VGG-model are further optimized using a sophisticated GA in order to select the most relevant features to AIFR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%