2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Extent of Antral Resection on Surgical Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity (A Prospective Randomized Study)

Abstract: LSG is a safe and effective procedure with good short-term outcome. Increasing the size of the resected antrum is associated with better weight loss without increasing the rate of complications significantly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the antral resection, conservative surgeons may prefer to begin the resection at 6 cm from the pylorus with the aims of improving gastric emptying by preserving its contractile function and of decreasing intraluminal pressure, which allow early closure of any potential gastric leakage, whereas other surgeons perform the resection close to the pylorus and therefore achieve and maintain better weight loss results. Abdallah et al randomly allocated 159 morbidly obese patients undergoing LSG as a standalone procedure into group I (LSG in which the division begins 2 cm from the pylorus) and group II (LSG in which the division begins 6 cm from the pylorus), and they found the group I patients achieved significantly better weight loss up to 2 years without increasing complication rates [20]. On the other hand, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis (9991 cases in 112 studies) by Parikh M et al, distance from the pylorus did not affect %EWL or leakage when LSG is performed as a primary bariatric procedure [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the antral resection, conservative surgeons may prefer to begin the resection at 6 cm from the pylorus with the aims of improving gastric emptying by preserving its contractile function and of decreasing intraluminal pressure, which allow early closure of any potential gastric leakage, whereas other surgeons perform the resection close to the pylorus and therefore achieve and maintain better weight loss results. Abdallah et al randomly allocated 159 morbidly obese patients undergoing LSG as a standalone procedure into group I (LSG in which the division begins 2 cm from the pylorus) and group II (LSG in which the division begins 6 cm from the pylorus), and they found the group I patients achieved significantly better weight loss up to 2 years without increasing complication rates [20]. On the other hand, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis (9991 cases in 112 studies) by Parikh M et al, distance from the pylorus did not affect %EWL or leakage when LSG is performed as a primary bariatric procedure [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a prospectively randomized trial studied this issue and found that antral resection is associated with better weight loss without increasing the morbidity [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antral preservation seems to be preferable in spite of the low level of evidence of the studies comparing these two techniques. In fact, the preservation of the antrum could reduce the risk of postoperative leak (Abdallah et al, ; ElGeidie et al, ), could accelerate gastric emptying allowing to reduce postoperative food discomfort (Melissas et al, ), and could reduce the frequency of postoperative gastro esophageal reflux diseases (Stenard and Ianelli, ). All these advantages are related to the preservation of distal branches of the left vagus nerve during antral preservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%