2017
DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2017.9.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Electronic Prescribing System on Prescribing Error Rate at Patients’ Transition of Care: An Interventional Study

Abstract: Objective:To estimate the prevalence of prescribing errors before and after implementing electronic discharge prescription system in the wards of General Surgery in a tertiary care hospital in India. Methodology: Patients discharged from General Surgery wards with a prescription containing atleast one drug were selected. Discharge prescriptions were collected before and after implementing the electronic prescribing system. Patients' demographic details like age, gender, diagnosis and number days of hospital st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Yugandhar et al opined that electronic prescribing system reduced 75% of prescribing errors with error rate being 8.4% compared to 33% of handwritten prescriptions. 22 The dispensing errors due to inadequate deciphering of "doctor scribble" can be eliminated. Handwritten prescriptions had 5.5 higher odds of having prescribing errors (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.6-6.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Yugandhar et al opined that electronic prescribing system reduced 75% of prescribing errors with error rate being 8.4% compared to 33% of handwritten prescriptions. 22 The dispensing errors due to inadequate deciphering of "doctor scribble" can be eliminated. Handwritten prescriptions had 5.5 higher odds of having prescribing errors (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.6-6.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handwritten prescriptions had 5.5 higher odds of having prescribing errors (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.6-6.1). 22 Panchbhai et al stated that pre-printed prescriptions and electronic entry devices can reduce illegibility and hence medication errors. 23 The drug-drug interaction alerts, knowledge about past history of drug allergies and adverse drug reactions, suggestion of right dosage will make e-prescriptions prone for less prescribing errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Saudi studies show that the prescription error rate is much higher with handwritten (35.7%) than with electronic (2.5%) prescriptions. 5,6 These studies also report a wide variation of errors from handwritten prescriptions (range: 7%-94%). [7][8][9] Convenience sampling, a difference in sources (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a prescription to be accurate, it must include the following essential components: prescriber name, address, and telephone number; date of the prescription; generic name of the drug; strength (dose), dosage form, and total amount of the drug; label (instruction and warning); patient name, address, and age; and signature or initials of the prescriber 2 . Compared with electronic prescriptions, handwritten prescriptions have been associated with a higher prescription error rate 1,3,4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Compared with electronic prescriptions, handwritten prescriptions have been associated with a higher prescription error rate. 1,3,4 A prescription error occurs when, as a result of a prescribing decision or the prescription writing process, there is an unintentional significant reduction in the probability of treatment being timely and effective or an increase in the risk of harm compared with generally accepted practice. 5 In general practice, prescription errors are common, 6,7 and are related to any the following: absence of the name of the prescriber, 8,9 diagnosis, 10 or date; 11 illegible handwriting; 3,10,[12][13][14] use of other names rather than the generic drug name; 10,12,15 or strength of the drug not being specified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%