2017
DOI: 10.2196/medinform.7958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Electronic Health Records on Long-Term Care Facilities: Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundLong-term care (LTC) facilities are an important part of the health care industry, providing care to the fastest-growing group of the population. However, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in LTC facilities lags behind other areas of the health care industry. One of the reasons for the lack of widespread adoption in the United States is that LTC facilities are not eligible for incentives under the Meaningful Use program. Implementation of an EHR system in an LTC facility can potentiall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…38 A recent systematic review focusing on resident quality outcomes associated with electronic health records in LTC had mixed findings. 39 While this study sheds light on common content and information workflow across several LTC facilities, it does not replace the need for a facility-level assessment of information needs and workflow for clinical care prior to information system implementation. This study may inform and reduce the time needed for a local needs assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 A recent systematic review focusing on resident quality outcomes associated with electronic health records in LTC had mixed findings. 39 While this study sheds light on common content and information workflow across several LTC facilities, it does not replace the need for a facility-level assessment of information needs and workflow for clinical care prior to information system implementation. This study may inform and reduce the time needed for a local needs assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prompts have led to slight improvements in clinician action 18 and to increased clinician compliance. 4 These mechanisms capitalize on the use of better data for clinicians to make better care-related decisions, which should ultimately improve the efficiency and quality of care (Kruse et al, 2017). 19 In addition, the data in aggregate form can help managerial staff supply data to regulators, apply for grants and thus become better funded, and make better managerial decisions.…”
Section: Emr Implementation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 These mechanisms capitalize on the use of better data for clinicians to make better care-related decisions, which should ultimately improve the efficiency and quality of care (Kruse et al, 2017). 19 In addition, the data in aggregate form can help managerial staff supply data to regulators, apply for grants and thus become better funded, and make better managerial decisions. 17,20 A third way that EMRs can improve the efficiency and quality of care is through staff oversight and productivity improvements.…”
Section: Emr Implementation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools have been on the rise in recent years due to their ability to bring evidence-based medicine to point of care. A Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) is a health information system that is integrated into Electronic Health Records (EHR), enabling easy and effective use by physicians [9]. A CDSS incorporates individual patient data, a rule engine, and a medical knowledge base to produce a patient-specific assessment or recommendation of a management plan [10].…”
Section: Clinical Decision Support Systems (Cdss)mentioning
confidence: 99%