2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of electrical impedance spectroscopy on dermatologists' number needed to biopsy metric and biopsy decisions for pigmented skin lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EIS scores elevated the biopsy sensitivity of students close to that of dermatologists with images alone, suggesting particular value of EIS for novice diagnosticians. Moreover, this improvement in diagnostic accuracy among medical students is consistent with recent studies where the addition of EIS scores to clinical images alone increased diagnostic accuracy for novice diagnosticians, including trainees and midlevel practitioners [14][15][16] . Among the pigmented lesions specialists, the addition of an EIS score resulted in a trend toward improved accuracy of diagnosis, but it did not reach statistical significance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EIS scores elevated the biopsy sensitivity of students close to that of dermatologists with images alone, suggesting particular value of EIS for novice diagnosticians. Moreover, this improvement in diagnostic accuracy among medical students is consistent with recent studies where the addition of EIS scores to clinical images alone increased diagnostic accuracy for novice diagnosticians, including trainees and midlevel practitioners [14][15][16] . Among the pigmented lesions specialists, the addition of an EIS score resulted in a trend toward improved accuracy of diagnosis, but it did not reach statistical significance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The addition of EIS scores to clinical images resulted in more accurate biopsy decisionmaking by clinicians in survey studies. [14][15][16] . To date, however, the impact of EIS scores on clinician confidence in diagnosing lesions as benign or malignant remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the diagnostic accuracy improved with the additional EIS examination, which resulted in a reduction in the number of biopsies of benign lesions [96]. Similarly, including EIS examination in the clinical decision-making process significantly decreased the number needed to biopsy from 6.3 to 5.3 in another recent study [97]. Melanomas present in the extremities and trunk were better detected using EIS (sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 64%) than those located at the head and neck region [95].…”
Section: Melanomamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These devices (Nevisense, MarginProbe, ZedScan) can discriminate healthy tissues from cancerous tissues (respectively, skin, breast and cervical) with high sensitivity and specificity. [71][72][73] The EIS-based devices use multiple sensors which are in direct contact with the tissue to be probed, avoiding electrical noise coming from other biological components interposed between the electrodes and the tissue itself. This enhances the capability of detecting the electrical properties of the tissues that reflect its morphological and pathological structure.…”
Section: Bioimpedance: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SciBase, Dilon Technologies, Zilico, are some of the companies that developed medical devices with CE and/or FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) approval. These devices (Nevisense, MarginProbe, ZedScan) can discriminate healthy tissues from cancerous tissues (respectively, skin, breast and cervical) with high sensitivity and specificity 71–73. The EIS-based devices use multiple sensors which are in direct contact with the tissue to be probed, avoiding electrical noise coming from other biological components interposed between the electrodes and the tissue itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%