2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of economic incentives on quality of professional life and on end-user satisfaction in primary care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalan PHC teams are financed by a per capita budget and by a variable part related to the achievement of health-care quality objectives, measured with performance indicators [6,8]. Evaluation of primary health-care teams must take these structural factors into account to avoid erroneous measurements of service quality due to the non-modifiable structural factors that affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Catalan PHC teams are financed by a per capita budget and by a variable part related to the achievement of health-care quality objectives, measured with performance indicators [6,8]. Evaluation of primary health-care teams must take these structural factors into account to avoid erroneous measurements of service quality due to the non-modifiable structural factors that affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary health-care teams obtain a per capita budget which also has a variable part based on the achievement of health-care quality objectives measured with performance indicators [7]. This incentive is subsequently transferred to the salaries of the professionals themselves since 2003 when ICS launched a performance payment scheme among its public physicians and nurses [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asch et al 18 found that, following the introduction of a PM system, facilities improved not only on PM scores but also on related clinical measures that were not tracked by the PM system. Other studies have found inconsistent relationships between PM and the patient-centeredness of care 19 20. However, none of these studies attempted to identify a comprehensive set of ancillary benefits or to integrate these benefits into a conceptual framework of the effects of PM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire on the characteristics of the home care professionals was developed on evidence-based literature on job satisfaction among care professionals in the elderly home care setting [1415161718192021212324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354]. This questionnaire mainly consists of pre-existing validated questions and scales: the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire [6667], the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory [68], the impact subscale of the Job Role Quality survey [69], the Intention-to-turnover scale [70], the Scheduling Dissatisfaction Scale [51], the Physical Workload Scale [71] and the Individualised Care Scale-nurse [7252].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%