2014
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2014.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of drug-eluting stents with different coating strategies on stent thrombosis: A meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials

Abstract: Background: Whether drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers (BP-DES) improve safety, especially with respect to stent thrombosis (ST) compared with permanent polymers DES (PP-DES (OR 0.33;) compared with PP-DES. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding MI incidence and mortality during both short and long follow-up periods. In stratified analyses, the long-term superiority of BP-DES was maintained only by using first-generation DES as the comparators. Conclusions: The present … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, BES versus second‐generation DES showed higher rates of definite ST than CoCr‐EES . On the other hand, the beneficial outcomes regarding late lumen loss and late ST after biodegradable‐polymer‐DES versus durable‐polymer‐DES have been documented in the meta‐analysis made by Lupi et al Significantly lower risk of very late ST in biodegradable‐polymer‐BES versus durable polymer DES has been reported by Ye and Niu X et al . In both studies, heterogenous‐DES‐comparators were used in different patient subsets, which could fundamentally influence safety and efficacy results .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, BES versus second‐generation DES showed higher rates of definite ST than CoCr‐EES . On the other hand, the beneficial outcomes regarding late lumen loss and late ST after biodegradable‐polymer‐DES versus durable‐polymer‐DES have been documented in the meta‐analysis made by Lupi et al Significantly lower risk of very late ST in biodegradable‐polymer‐BES versus durable polymer DES has been reported by Ye and Niu X et al . In both studies, heterogenous‐DES‐comparators were used in different patient subsets, which could fundamentally influence safety and efficacy results .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparison of different DES is further complicated by various stent variants used . As such, delayed strut endothelialization as a trigger of ST depends on the polymer, strut structure and thickness and drug load .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotactic factors as the herein evaluated can be incorporated into polymers on surfaces of the implant material. Thereby a directed release over time can be achieved leading to an enhanced factor concentration into the area of interest [ 38 , 39 ]. EDX and ESEM analyses showed in this study complete surface covering of PCL on the coated titanium implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the consistency of the main results by testing whether consecutively deleting each trial would influence the overall estimates for the myocardial enzyme levels. A study was considered to be influential if its exclusion changed the effect estimate by at least 20% [ 29 ]. All findings were also repeated using a fixed-effect model, and only the data from high-quality studies were analysed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%