2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of displacement demand reliability for seismic vulnerability assessment at an urban scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e methodology used in this study for the nonlinear timehistory analysis (NLTHA) is similar to the one proposed in previous investigations [2,10]. Nonlinear responses of SDOF systems exposed to acceleration time-histories are computed and the difference between the obtained peak displacement demands and those predicted by the various simplified methods is calculated.…”
Section: Nltha Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e methodology used in this study for the nonlinear timehistory analysis (NLTHA) is similar to the one proposed in previous investigations [2,10]. Nonlinear responses of SDOF systems exposed to acceleration time-histories are computed and the difference between the obtained peak displacement demands and those predicted by the various simplified methods is calculated.…”
Section: Nltha Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable displacement demand predictions are therefore crucial for seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings. is is a key issue in vulnerability assessment at urban scale, where such displacement demand predictions are used for determining building damage using mechanical methods [2]. On the plateau of design spectra, Riddell et al [3] and later Vidic et al [4] proposed to compute the displacement demand based on a linear variation of the strength reduction factor as a function of the period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relative uncertainty following a zero-mean normal distribution with a standard deviation of 7.5% is linked to the acceleration demand values given by the ADRS spectra. The base-shear values are estimated to be affected by a uniform relative uncertainty bounded between −20% and 20%, which also covers uncertainty related to the N2 method itself, which has been shown to be inaccurate for high frequency values when the equal displacement rule does not apply [70]. For the uncertainties related to the definition of DG boundaries the same values than for identification are used (see Section 3.3.1).…”
Section: Sources Of Uncertainty For Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both methods of vulnerability determination (deterministic and probabilistic), the accuracy is calculated as the sum of the differences in absolute value between the number of buildings attributed by the ARL to each damage grade and the "real" number of building for each damage grade (Diana et al, 2018), according to the following equation:…”
Section: Validation Of Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the typology distribution being defined in the previous section, the damage distribution for the entire city of Basel can be estimated for any seismic intensity. The damage distribution is achieved by the aggregation of the probability distribution multiplied by the number of related buildings according to the typology distribution (Diana et al, 2018).…”
Section: Seismic-vulnerability Assessment For the Entire City Of Basementioning
confidence: 99%