2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.043622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of direct-digital-synthesizer finite resolution on atom gravimeters

Abstract: We report on the study of the impact of the finite resolution of the chirp rate applied on the frequency difference between the Raman lasers beamsplitters onto the phase of a free fall atom gravimeter. This chirp induces a phase shift that compensates the one due to gravity acceleration, allowing for its precise determination in terms of frequencies. In practice, it is most often generated by a direct digital synthesizer (DDS). Besides the effect of eventual truncation errors, we evaluate here the bias on the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, third-order diffraction might be an interesting tool for the diffraction of wave packets with a narrow momentum distribution like BECs, since it allows one to reduce the complexity of the experiment. In general, each transition of a sequence might introduce spurious phase contributions [45], and using fewer pulses may facilitate the suppression of some uncertainties connected to frequency chirps [46][47][48]. Furthermore, the overall duration of a single pulse can become shorter than that of a corresponding sequence of pulses, which might be particularly appealing for very compact setups [49] intended for real-world applications [50].…”
Section: B Comparison To First-order and Sequential Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, third-order diffraction might be an interesting tool for the diffraction of wave packets with a narrow momentum distribution like BECs, since it allows one to reduce the complexity of the experiment. In general, each transition of a sequence might introduce spurious phase contributions [45], and using fewer pulses may facilitate the suppression of some uncertainties connected to frequency chirps [46][47][48]. Furthermore, the overall duration of a single pulse can become shorter than that of a corresponding sequence of pulses, which might be particularly appealing for very compact setups [49] intended for real-world applications [50].…”
Section: B Comparison To First-order and Sequential Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the Raman lasers frequency difference is driven by two separate frequency synthesizers, namely a synthesizer (NI, QuickSyn Lite Synthesizer) driving the high frequency side of the Raman lasers (ω 1 , 6.58 GHz) and a direct digital synthesizer (DDS, AD9854) driving the low frequency side of the Raman lasers (ω 2 , 123 MHz), see Figure 3. The frequency chirping is provided by AD9854 via a double-pass AOM during the interferometry sequence, ensuring deterministic frequency shifting and micro-second time steps 23 . The intensity ratio between the Raman lasers is easily adjusted via the halfwave plate and polarization beamsplitter pair (which overlaps the two laser beams) in order to minimise the AC Stark shift of the laser transitions 24 .…”
Section: Frequency Control a Eom Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we study an asymmetric Ramsey-Bordé (RB) configuration used to determine the fine structure constant for fundamental test in QED [19,46] and Mach-Zehnder (MZ) and Butterfly (BU) interferometers for acceleration and rotation measurement [14,86,[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103]. We apply composite pulse protocols to realize a generalized hyper-Ramsey-Bordé (GHRB) interferometer reducing or eliminating residual corrections from light-shift and sensitivity to residual transverse Dopplershifts.…”
Section: Hyper-interferometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser frequency is linearly scanned during the three-pulse interferometer for four different free evolutions times. When the laser frequency chirp becomes equal the local acceleration, the free fall inducing a Doppler-shift is canceled and interferences become independent to a modification of the free evolution time [92,97,100,102].…”
Section: Mz and Bu Interferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%