2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-020-00865-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Different Doses of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Outcomes: a Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose of Review Omega-3 fatty acid (O3FA) supplementation has shown conflicting evidence regarding its benefit in cardiovascular events. We performed a pairwise and network meta-analysis to elucidate the benefit of different doses of O3FA supplementation in cardiovascular prevention. Recent Findings Fourteen studies were identified providing data on 125,763 patients. A prespecified cutoff value of < 1 g per day was set for low-dose (LD) O3FA and > 1 g per day for high-dose (HD) O3FA. The efficacy outcomes of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most large RCT v. placebo also support a CHD protective effect in secondary prevention with about a 20 % decrease in CHD death and 30 % decrease in CHD events with doses of EPA þ DHA ≥ 900 mg/d in secondary CHD prevention. This is confirmed by several recent meta-analyses (118,(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126) . Negative studies for some of them can be criticised for their lack of power and/or by the use of OO as a placebo.…”
Section: Meta-analysessupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most large RCT v. placebo also support a CHD protective effect in secondary prevention with about a 20 % decrease in CHD death and 30 % decrease in CHD events with doses of EPA þ DHA ≥ 900 mg/d in secondary CHD prevention. This is confirmed by several recent meta-analyses (118,(120)(121)(122)(123)(124)(125)(126) . Negative studies for some of them can be criticised for their lack of power and/or by the use of OO as a placebo.…”
Section: Meta-analysessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…They decreased CHD by 10 % (RR 0•90; 95 % CI 0•84, 0•96) and MI by 12 % (RR 0•88; 95 % CI 0•83, 0•94). Lombardi et al (123) (124) , in 2020, included sixteen RCT (81 073 patients with previous CV events, dose of LC n-3 PUFA ≥ 1 g/d for ≥ 1 year). LC n-3 PUFA supplementation was associated with a 9 % decrease in cardiac mortality (RR 0•91; 95 % CI 0•85, 0•98), a 9 % decrease in MACE (RR 0•90; 95 % CI 0•82, 0•99) and a 17 % decrease in MI (RR 0•83; 95 % CI 0•71, 0•98).…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a few clinical studies have shown the effectiveness of n-3 PUFAs in high-risk patients, the benefit of n-3 PUFAs in the prevention of ASCVD remains controversial [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. For primary prevention, a study of cardiovascular events in diabetes (ASCEND) [43] and a long-term outcomes study to assess STatin Residual Risk Reduction With EpaNova in HiGh Cardiovascular Risk PatienTs With Hypertriglyceridemia (STRENGTH) [44] failed to show a significant reduction in ASCVD by n-3 PUFA formulation in high risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second 2019 meta-analysis of the studies, from which the REDUCE-IT study was excluded because of the comparatively high level of its omega-3 dose, showed that omega-3 supplementation was associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction by 8%, total coronary heart disease by 5%, coronary heart disease death by 8%, and cardiovascular death by 7% [37]. Further evidence of the beneficial effect of omega-3 fatty acids in reducing cardiovascular risk is also found in the results of two meta-analyses from 2020 [38,39], although there was also an associated higher risk of bleeding events and atrial fibrillation events in some instances [39].…”
Section: Polyunsaturated Omega-3 Fatty Acidsmentioning
confidence: 88%