2008
DOI: 10.2337/db07-1736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Diabetes Susceptibility Loci on Progression From Pre-Diabetes to Diabetes in At-Risk Individuals of the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1)

Abstract: the DPT-1 Study Group OBJECTIVE-The unfolding of type 1 diabetes involves a number of steps: defective immunological tolerance, priming of anti-islet autoimmunity, and destruction of insulin-producing ␤-cells. A number of genetic loci contribute to susceptibility to type 1 diabetes, but it is unclear which stages of the disease are influenced by the different loci. Here, we analyzed the frequency of type 1 diabetes-risk alleles among individuals from the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) clinical trial,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the T1DGC ASP families, homozygosity for the protective T allele at rs689 delayed diagnosis of T1D by 1.7 year and the frequency of the T allele was 0.02 higher in those diagnosed with T1D over 10 year than those diagnosed at 10 year or less. Combined with the previous findings,65,66 these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the T allele at rs689 delays the onset of T1D. However, the age-at-diagnosis effect, although associated at P = 0.001, is not observed in the JDRF/WT case series ( P = 0.32, unpublished data, n = 900 cases diagnosed >12 year).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the T1DGC ASP families, homozygosity for the protective T allele at rs689 delayed diagnosis of T1D by 1.7 year and the frequency of the T allele was 0.02 higher in those diagnosed with T1D over 10 year than those diagnosed at 10 year or less. Combined with the previous findings,65,66 these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the T allele at rs689 delays the onset of T1D. However, the age-at-diagnosis effect, although associated at P = 0.001, is not observed in the JDRF/WT case series ( P = 0.32, unpublished data, n = 900 cases diagnosed >12 year).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Specifically, the age-at-diagnosis effect at INS requires further investigation. The rs689 (−23 Hph I) polymorphism was associated with anti-insulin autoantibodies ( P = 3.7 × 10 −5 ) 65,66. These auto-antibodies are rarely found in older onset T1D cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other studies have not detected a significant association of the PTPN2 genotype with the development of islet autoantibodies [35,70,71]. No association of the PTPN2 rs1893217 risk genotype with progression to T1D has been detected in these studies or others [34,[70][71][72], although an interaction between the PTPN2 rs1893217 protective genotype and the vitamin D receptor SNP rs1544410 was associated with decreased risk of T1D in the DAISY cohort (p = 0.0004, HR = 0.24, 95% CI:0.11-0.53) [71]. Taken together, these studies indicate that the PTPN2 rs1893217 genotype alone does not appear to be a significant risk factor for the development of T1D, but PTPN2 may influence the development of islet autoimmunity and age at onset, suggesting a role for PTPN2 in disease initiation rather than progression.…”
Section: The Role Of Ptpn2 In the Development And Progression Of T1dmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is particularly relevant in humans where the diversity of HLA molecules can affect both the antigenic specificity of the T-cell repertoire and the ability to mount a T-cell response toward a particular antigen. T1D patients harbor a panel of HLA/MHC molecules43,44 which was suggested to affect therapeutic outcome 45. On the contrary, most preclinical studies using aAgs to induce tolerance were performed in a single animal model for T1D presenting a single MHC background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%