2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of delineation uncertainties on dose to organs at risk in CT-guided intracavitary brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, inter-observer studies on contouring variation demonstrate superior results for MRI-based delineation when compared with CT-based approach. 44, 51-54 Ultrasound and PET CT may add complementary information during delineation, but their role as eventual independent modality for contouring remains to be defined. In summary, TDM-guided applicator prototyping should be based on target volumes, delineated on MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, inter-observer studies on contouring variation demonstrate superior results for MRI-based delineation when compared with CT-based approach. 44, 51-54 Ultrasound and PET CT may add complementary information during delineation, but their role as eventual independent modality for contouring remains to be defined. In summary, TDM-guided applicator prototyping should be based on target volumes, delineated on MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. PIBS, PIBS+2 cm, and PIBS-2 cm determined from sagittal MRI corresponding to BT treatment to the mean [25]. For each of the P = 5 patients (p) and each of the n = 5 observers (o), two dose measurements M = 2 (m) in each point (i) were carried out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] Duane et al, in their study in eight patients, examined the reflection of uncertainties in OAR contours drawn by different individuals in the DVH parameter, respectively, 13.2% and 9% of the bladder and rectum D 2cm3 were determined. [21] In a study conducted by Saarnak et al, images of 10 patients were contoured by bladder and rectum volumes by three separate users, and the inter-user variability for D 2cm3 was 10% and 11% in the bladder and rectum, respectively. [22] Differences between D2cc and D0.1cc dose sum between DIR and rigid registration may be clinically significant, although the difference in OAR volumes is less than the variability of different individuals.…”
Section: Dir-based Contour Propagation In Gynecological Brtmentioning
confidence: 99%