2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge

Abstract: Background Hereditary breast cancer (BC), ovarian cancer (OC), and pancreatic cancer (PC) are the major BRCA -associated tumours. However, some BRCA1/2 -wild-type (wt) patients with a strong personal and/or family history of cancer need a further genetic testing through a multi-gene panel containing other high- and moderate-risk susceptibility genes. Patients and methods Our study was aimed to assess if some BC, OC, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(78 reference statements)
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of these mutations were found in non-BRCA genes, with two affecting ATM, one affecting PALB2, and one affecting RAD50 [ 37 ]. Consistent with these observations, our recent study using an expanded panel of 22 genes associated with HR, demonstrated an overall mutation frequency of 15% [ 35 ], with similar results observed in a study using a more focused molecular panel of six genes [ 38 ]. Accordingly, a large-scale meta-analysis evaluated several surrogate markers of HRD in PDAC, focusing on BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , ATM , ATR , CHEK2 , RAD51 , and FANC .…”
Section: Pdac and Genetic Defects In Homologous Recombinationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of these mutations were found in non-BRCA genes, with two affecting ATM, one affecting PALB2, and one affecting RAD50 [ 37 ]. Consistent with these observations, our recent study using an expanded panel of 22 genes associated with HR, demonstrated an overall mutation frequency of 15% [ 35 ], with similar results observed in a study using a more focused molecular panel of six genes [ 38 ]. Accordingly, a large-scale meta-analysis evaluated several surrogate markers of HRD in PDAC, focusing on BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , ATM , ATR , CHEK2 , RAD51 , and FANC .…”
Section: Pdac and Genetic Defects In Homologous Recombinationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, in relapsed platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian cancer patients, therapeutic responses to Rucaparib were not restricted to BRCA -mutated tumors, and were observed in several patients with mutations to other HR genes including ATM , NBN , RAD51C , and RAD51D [ 132 ]. In PDAC, several studies now suggest that the true rates of HRD in PDAC patients may be underreported using only BRCA and PALB2 mutations as the defining criteria [ 35 , 38 , 39 ]. Hence, mutations to non-classic HR genes warrant continued exploration as a predictor of drug responses, particularly as PARP inhibitors advance in the treatment of other cancers, often in combination with chemotherapy or radiation [ 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 ].…”
Section: Summary and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenic variants in PALB2, ATM and BARD1 are recognized by the NCCN as involved in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome but have insufficient evidence to determine their ovarian cancer risk [74].…”
Section: Incidence Of Ovarian Carcinoma With Rare Hoc Susceptibility ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 45 However, the evaluation of sole BRCA in the cancer tissue does not allow the identification of deleterious variants in other genes associated with hereditary ovarian cancer risk, which are mutated in 4%-7% of patients with ovarian cancer. 46 Notably, although BRCA1/2 gene PVs account for the vast majority of the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, PVs of other genes can be involved, and could explain an HRD status when no BRCA1/2 PVs are identified. BRCA1 methylations status should be also considered for a better understanding of HRD status.…”
Section: The Interpretation Of Brca Genetic Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%