2007
DOI: 10.4141/p06-067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of cultivar, row spacing and seeding rate on ascochyta blight severity and yield of chickpea

Abstract: Impact of cultivar, row spacing and seeding rate on ascochyta blight severity and yield of chickpea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 87: [395][396][397][398][399][400][401][402][403]. Field trials to assess the impact of chickpea type (desi vs. kabuli), row spacing and seeding rate on ascochyta blight of chickpea were conducted over 2 yr at Brooks, Alberta. A compound-leaved desi chickpea cultivar and unifoliate kabuli cultivar were sown at 20, 30 and 40 cm row spacing, and at three seeding rates (20, 40 and 60 seeds per 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different approaches are available to manage Ascochyta blight in chickpea crops with varying levels of effectiveness. These include foliar fungicide applications, seed treatment, agronomic practices, growing resistant cultivars and integration of two or more control options (Gan et al, 2006 ; Chang et al, 2007a ; Dusunceli et al, 2007 ; Lobna et al, 2010 ). Although different Ascochyta blight management options are available for growers, breeding for host plant resistance is given the highest priority by national and international chickpea breeding programs (Singh and Reddy, 1996 ; Muehlbauer and Chen, 2007 ; Rubiales and Fondevilla, 2012 ; Sharma and Ghosh, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches are available to manage Ascochyta blight in chickpea crops with varying levels of effectiveness. These include foliar fungicide applications, seed treatment, agronomic practices, growing resistant cultivars and integration of two or more control options (Gan et al, 2006 ; Chang et al, 2007a ; Dusunceli et al, 2007 ; Lobna et al, 2010 ). Although different Ascochyta blight management options are available for growers, breeding for host plant resistance is given the highest priority by national and international chickpea breeding programs (Singh and Reddy, 1996 ; Muehlbauer and Chen, 2007 ; Rubiales and Fondevilla, 2012 ; Sharma and Ghosh, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results agree with previous findings in chickpea (Jettner et al, 1999; Gan et al, 2003a; Regan et al, 2003). The increased seed yield with high plant population is attributable to the production of more pods (Gan et al, 2003b) and more seeds per unit area (Regan et al, 2003), despite more disease on individual plants (Chang et al, 2007). Pulse plants grow slowly during the early part of the seedling growth period when soil water losses through evaporation can be substantial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chickpea grown in wider rows had less ascochyta blight than when grown in rows with a narrower spacing (Akem, 2001). In a recent study, Chang et al (2007) found that low PPD in chickpea reduced ascochyta severity and increased seed yield on a per‐plant basis, and that the seed yield per unit area was lower with lower PPD due to a fewer seeds per unit area. However, little is known about the effect of PPD on ascochyta blight in chickpea cultivars with different leaf types and growth habits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The development of integrated disease management is the key to success and increase chickpea production. In absence of chickpea variety totally resistance to ABL, some techniques have been used to control and reduce ABL disease effects, such as sowing pattern, row spacing and seed rate by identification of the optimum plant populations (Chang et al 2007) and application of fungicide (Armstrong-Cho et al 2008). Optimum row spacing and seed rate play an important role to increase the yield because thick plant population will not get proper light for photosynthesis and can be attacked by diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%