2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02430-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of CT-assessed changes in tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological response and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While pCR or major pathological response is achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy, longer disease-free survival and overall survival may be achieved because the immunotherapy response lasts longer [31] and micrometastases are eliminated [24] .Besides, the downstaging of 57.1% of primary tumors and the reduction in primary tumor size of 84.1% in this study were su cient to demonstrate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Studies have shown that tumor diameter reduction after neoadjuvant therapy is an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival of esophageal cancer [32]. It also signi cantly reduces the di culty of performing radical surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pCR or major pathological response is achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy, longer disease-free survival and overall survival may be achieved because the immunotherapy response lasts longer [31] and micrometastases are eliminated [24] .Besides, the downstaging of 57.1% of primary tumors and the reduction in primary tumor size of 84.1% in this study were su cient to demonstrate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Studies have shown that tumor diameter reduction after neoadjuvant therapy is an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival of esophageal cancer [32]. It also signi cantly reduces the di culty of performing radical surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above, most patients with cStage II or III disease undergo neoadjuvant treatment before esophagectomy. Although a significant positive correlation between the response of primary tumors to neoadjuvant treatment and patient survival is well known, 6 8) the primary tumor is not considered a target lesion in the response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST). 9) In the 12th edition, we introduced two new methods for evaluating primary tumor size using CT images: one uses the short diameter of the primary tumor, and the other uses the esophageal cross-sectional area.…”
Section: Details Problems and Prospects In Relation To Each Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] While these biomarkers have been identified as prognostic indicators for ESCC risk stratification and therapy decision-making, they overlook critical information on tumors. 18 Radiomics is a potentially valuable approach to extracting valuable data from computational medical images, providing a noninvasive option for assessing tumors and their immune microenvironment 19,20 as an alternative to biopsy. CT imaging is commonly utilized for cancer evaluation, particularly CECT for detecting primary tumors and lymph nodes in esophageal cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternately, some research focuses on using blood biomarkers to predict the response of ESCC patients to anti‐PD‐1 therapy 15–17 . While these biomarkers have been identified as prognostic indicators for ESCC risk stratification and therapy decision‐making, they overlook critical information on tumors 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%