2022
DOI: 10.30919/es8d43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Corona Virus Stay-at-Home Policies on Traffic Emissions and Ambient Pollutant Concentrations in Ghana, West Africa

Abstract: The objective of this study is to determine how policies for stay-at-home (lockdown) and phases of easing the lockdown, implemented by the Government of Ghana to slow the spread of COVID-19, impacted traffic emissions and ambient concentrations of particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5). Monthly data was collected from January 2020 to June 2020 from four roadside monitoring locations using mini vol air samplers. High-volume ambient samplers were used to collect PM data at two permanent (industrial and residential) lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced air pollution coverage as evidenced in some of the banner headlines since the onset of the pandemic. The general perception is that the lockdown periods may have improved the quality of air pollution because of reduced traffic on the roads (see also [ 50 ]). Despite the visibility given to public officials, yearly events, and international and national bodies in the coverage of air pollution issues, we did not see headlines covering the work of the academic and scientific community (see also [ 2 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced air pollution coverage as evidenced in some of the banner headlines since the onset of the pandemic. The general perception is that the lockdown periods may have improved the quality of air pollution because of reduced traffic on the roads (see also [ 50 ]). Despite the visibility given to public officials, yearly events, and international and national bodies in the coverage of air pollution issues, we did not see headlines covering the work of the academic and scientific community (see also [ 2 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%