2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-022-02261-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of cone wall roughness on turbulence swirling flow in a cyclone separator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerodynamic experiments match the simulation results and therefore the numerical calculations have great accuracy in Figure S3. The drag force on the airflow in the channel increases with surface roughness owing to internal vortices and surface friction in Figure S4, although the growth trend slows down gradually, which is consistent with the roughness variation pattern in vortex separators (Dehdarinejad et al , 2022). The following fitted prediction equation in exponential form is obtained using discrete points: …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The aerodynamic experiments match the simulation results and therefore the numerical calculations have great accuracy in Figure S3. The drag force on the airflow in the channel increases with surface roughness owing to internal vortices and surface friction in Figure S4, although the growth trend slows down gradually, which is consistent with the roughness variation pattern in vortex separators (Dehdarinejad et al , 2022). The following fitted prediction equation in exponential form is obtained using discrete points: …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…where C 1 , C 2 , and C 3 are constants that depend on Re P . 41 Usually, C 1 = 0.6167, C 2 = 46.5, and C 3 = −116.67 for 10 <Re P < 100, or C 1 = 0.357, C 2 = 148.62, and C 3 = − 47,500 for 1000 <Re P < 5000. The additional force F add includes virtual mass force, pressure gradient force, thermophoretic force, Brownian force, and Saffman's lift force.…”
Section: Performance Of the Primary Separation Part Of The Existing S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation of particle motion is given by where the sign p refers to the particle, so u p i , ρ p , and d p represent the velocity, density, and diameter of the droplets, respectively. C D is the drag force coefficient, which is calculated as where C 1 , C 2 , and C 3 are constants that depend on Re P . Usually, C 1 = 0.6167, C 2 = 46.5, and C 3 = −116.67 for 10 < Re P < 100, or C 1 = 0.357, C 2 = 148.62, and C 3 = – 47,500 for 1000 < Re P < 5000.…”
Section: Performance Of the Primary Separation Part Of The Existing S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…160 On the other hand, the turbulence intensity in cyclone separators is directly related to the square of the fluctuating velocity, and this turbulent energy significantly impacts the dispersion of particles within the system. 12,161,162 Particularly, for larger diameter particles, as introduced in this study case, the turbulence intensity plays a crucial role in determining whether they are trapped or able to escape. As a result, it significantly influences the overall performance of gas−particle cyclones.…”
Section: Gas−particle Flow Pattern 421 Gas Flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%