2022
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2072390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of compound mutations I1171N + F1174I and I1171N + L1198H on the structure of ALK in NSCLC pathogenesis: atomistic insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, molecular dynamic simulations was used to unveil the stability and flexibility of the selected ligands against the two fatty acid targets (Salifu et al, 2022). The cα atoms of the protein-ligand complexes were used to calculate the RMSD of the system that confirm low deviation of the system (Salifu et al, 2022), (Abdullahi et al, 2018). Generally, the acceptable threshold for an average change in RMSD of the protein-ligand complex 1-3Å (Ramírez and Caballero, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, molecular dynamic simulations was used to unveil the stability and flexibility of the selected ligands against the two fatty acid targets (Salifu et al, 2022). The cα atoms of the protein-ligand complexes were used to calculate the RMSD of the system that confirm low deviation of the system (Salifu et al, 2022), (Abdullahi et al, 2018). Generally, the acceptable threshold for an average change in RMSD of the protein-ligand complex 1-3Å (Ramírez and Caballero, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, molecular dynamic simulations was used to unveil the stability and flexibility of the selected ligands against the two fatty acid targets [48]. The cα atoms of the proteinligand complexes were used to calculate the RMSD of the system that confirm low deviation of the system [48], [49]. Generally, the acceptable threshold for an average change in RMSD of the protein-ligand complex 1-3Å [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with previous reports, these results suggest that compound mutations of the ALK gene affect the efficacy of first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs. To date, compound mutations of the ALK tyrosine kinase domain have been commonly considered a molecular mechanism of resistance to all-generation ALK-TKIs( Gainor et al, 2016 ; Yoda et al, 2018 ; Okada et al, 2019 ; Takahashi et al, 2020 ; Salifu et al, 2022 ). In only one report, the ALK C1156Y/L1198F composite mutant was found to be resistant to second- and third-generation ALK-TKIs but resensitive to crizotinib ( Shaw et al, 2016a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S1189C mutation in the ALK kinase domain has not been reported in previous studies, nor is it recorded in any publicly available databases of oncogenes (such as COSMIC and ClinVar). Although brigatinib ( Tu et al, 2019 ), alectinib ( Zhang et al, 2016 ), and lorlatinib ( Syed, 2019 ), as FDA-approved ALK inhibitors, are effective against the F1174L mutation, previous reports have shown that the ALK gene compound mutation is resistant to almost all ALK-TKI inhibitors ( Gainor et al, 2016 ; Takahashi et al, 2020 ; Salifu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation