2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Completion Lymph Node Dissection on Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma

Abstract: Background The need for complete lymph node dissection (CLND) in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is an important unanswered clinical question. Study Design Patients diagnosed with positive SNB at a melanoma referral center from 1991 to 2013 were studied. Outcomes of patients who underwent CLND were compared to those who did not undergo immediate CLND (observation group, OBS). Results There were 471 patients who had positive SNB; 375 (79.6%) in the CLND group and 96 (20.4%) in the OB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(36 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retrospective series have produced varied results and are subject to a considerable risk of selection bias. 911 The findings of one prospective study were similar to those in our trial, but its size (483 patients underwent randomization) and most recent follow-up left enough statistical uncertainty to preclude definitive conclusions. 12 MSLT-II, in which 1939 patients underwent randomization with a median follow-up of 43 months, provided sufficient data to resolve the central question: no significant survival benefit was imparted by immediate completion lymph-node dissection among patients with sentinel-node metastases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Retrospective series have produced varied results and are subject to a considerable risk of selection bias. 911 The findings of one prospective study were similar to those in our trial, but its size (483 patients underwent randomization) and most recent follow-up left enough statistical uncertainty to preclude definitive conclusions. 12 MSLT-II, in which 1939 patients underwent randomization with a median follow-up of 43 months, provided sufficient data to resolve the central question: no significant survival benefit was imparted by immediate completion lymph-node dissection among patients with sentinel-node metastases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…8 Results of retrospective evaluations of the usefulness of completion lymph-node dissection are inconclusive. 911 Available data from one prospective study do not suggest a benefit from immediate dissection, but this study is not sufficiently powered to rule out a clinically significant benefit. 12 In addition, in most patients, nodal disease is limited to the sentinel lymph node or nodes and is removed by means of biopsy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some patients may benefit from lymphadenectomy as a therapeutic intervention, while for others the procedure may be solely diagnostic or even not beneficial in the longterm, depending on the characteristics of the primary tumour. 42,43,[50][51][52][53][54] Disease and site-specific studies will be necessary in dogs to delineate populations where intervention may be helpful…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further five studies were excluded because they either had a missing intervention or control group, or the population of interest was not studied. After review, 15 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis ( Fig . ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%