2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of common envelope development criteria on the formation of LIGO/Virgo sources

Abstract: The treatment and criteria for development of unstable Roche lobe overflow (RLOF) that leads to the common envelope (CE) phase have hindered the area of evolutionary predictions for decades. In particular, the formation of black hole-black hole (BH-BH), black hole-neutron star (BH-NS), and neutron star-neutron star (NS-NS) merging binaries depends sensitively on the CE phase in classical isolated binary evolution model. All these mergers are now reported as LIGO/Virgo sources or source candidates. CE is even c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction that the population of merging BBHs originates from a mixture of systems formed through the CE and stable RLOF channel, has been reported by various authors based on simulations with different codes and we thus believe this to be robust (e.g. van den Heuvel et al 2017;Bavera et al 2021;Marchant et al 2021;Broekgaarden et al 2021;Gallegos-Garcia et al 2021;Shao & Li 2021;Olejak et al 2021). Moreover, the bimodality in the delay time distribution has also been found in other work inspecting BBHs formed through the isolated binary formation channel; see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The prediction that the population of merging BBHs originates from a mixture of systems formed through the CE and stable RLOF channel, has been reported by various authors based on simulations with different codes and we thus believe this to be robust (e.g. van den Heuvel et al 2017;Bavera et al 2021;Marchant et al 2021;Broekgaarden et al 2021;Gallegos-Garcia et al 2021;Shao & Li 2021;Olejak et al 2021). Moreover, the bimodality in the delay time distribution has also been found in other work inspecting BBHs formed through the isolated binary formation channel; see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The situation is even more complex when considering that our larger suite of models (560 realizations) still only represents a subset of the overall uncertainties in population synthesis studies. For example, even our broader set of models does not account for uncertainties in the stellar evolution tracks (e.g., Laplace et al 2020;Agrawal et al 2020), internal mixing (e.g., Schootemeijer et al 2019), stellar rotation (e.g., de Mink & Mandel 2016Mapelli et al 2020), the more complex physics of the CE phase (e.g., Klencki et al 2021;Ivanova et al 2020;Marchant et al 2021;Olejak et al 2021), the additional possible remnant mass prescriptions (e.g. Dabrowny et al 2021;, the initial conditions of binary systems (e.g., de Mink & Belczynski 2015;Moe & Di Stefano 2017;Klencki et al 2018), and the possible contributions from other formation channels (e.g., Zevin et al 2021).…”
Section: A Realistic View Of Population Synthesis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that the embedded companion is a BH, then feedback produced by the BH can be deposited into the envelope of the host star, potentially unbinding it and producing novel electromagnetic transients (Moreno Méndez et al 2017a;López-Cámara et al 2020). If the envelope unbinds before the BH merges with the core of the host star, then this will alter the configuration of the binary remnant, which could hinder the viability of common envelopes as formation channels for LIGO/Virgo sources (e.g., Olejak et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%