2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2470-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of clinical factors and UGT1A9 and CYP2B6 genotype on inter-individual differences in propofol pharmacokinetics

Abstract: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000022948).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[26]. In contrast, other studies reported no significant effects of these SNPs on propofol metabolism [7,8,10,24], which partially concur with our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[26]. In contrast, other studies reported no significant effects of these SNPs on propofol metabolism [7,8,10,24], which partially concur with our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The biotransformation of propofol is greatly dependent on liver metabolism [17][18][19], and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 and uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A9, the main enzymes involved in propofol metabolism, are responsible for the hydroxylation and glucuronidation of propofol [20][21][22]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP2B6 and UGT1A9 might contribute to the inter-individual variability in the rate of formation of propofol metabolites [21][22][23], while several studies reported no significant effect of these SNPs on propofol metabolism [7,8,10,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…26 In contrast, some studies have reported that CYP2B6 rs3745274 contributes little to the variation of drug effects of propofol. 3,[27][28][29][30] Our current results suggest that CYP2B6 rs3745274 and rs2279343 do not influence propofol susceptibility during the induction period of anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%