2016
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000002441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Chronic Total Occlusion in a Noninfarct-related Artery on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract: In the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), encountering with chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a noninfarct-related artery (IRA) is not a rare situation. Limited information on the impact of CTO on clinical outcomes in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary PCI has raised more concerns. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent CTO in a non-IRA on the clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study further extends these conclusions to patients with STEMI who underwent PCI in nIRA CTO as shown in another meta‐analysis of contemporary RCTs in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD 7. The idea that patients with acute STEMI and concurrent nIRA CTO would demonstrate clinical benefit from CTO PCI was generated from the apparent 2‐fold increased mortality and morbidity rates among patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD and CTO 4, 5, 21. Even among patients without STEMI, increased mortality has been attributed to the presence of CTOs in nIRAs 3, 6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study further extends these conclusions to patients with STEMI who underwent PCI in nIRA CTO as shown in another meta‐analysis of contemporary RCTs in patients with STEMI with multivessel CAD 7. The idea that patients with acute STEMI and concurrent nIRA CTO would demonstrate clinical benefit from CTO PCI was generated from the apparent 2‐fold increased mortality and morbidity rates among patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD and CTO 4, 5, 21. Even among patients without STEMI, increased mortality has been attributed to the presence of CTOs in nIRAs 3, 6.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…7 The idea that patients with acute STEMI and concurrent nIRA CTO would demonstrate clinical benefit from CTO PCI was generated from the apparent 2-fold increased mortality and morbidity rates among patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD and CTO. 4,5,21 Even among patients without STEMI, increased mortality has been attributed to the presence of CTOs in nIRAs. 3,6 One of the possible mechanisms of increased mortality in patients with CTO could be a larger infarct size caused by the acute occlusion of a donor artery to CTO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4 , 12 17 ] Finally, 5 studies containing a total of 1083 patients were included in the analysis, of which there was 1 randomized controlled trial, [ 11 ] and 4 observational studies. [ 18 21 ] Details and baseline characteristics of the included studies are listed in Tables 1 – 5 . The quality of the enrolled studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottowa scale in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term cardiac mortality was reported in the above 5 studies. [ 11 , 18 21 ] Successful revascularization of CTO was closely linked with decreased long-term cardiac mortality (the absolute risk was 6.02% vs 12.55%; OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19–0.68; P = .002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, encountering with non-IRA CTOs is not a rare situation. 20 Among STEMI patients, about 50% have single vessel disease, while about 40% have multivessel disease (MVD) and near 10% have MVD with non-IRA CTO. 21 The occurrence of non-IRA CTO is present in approximately one-third of patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and MVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%