2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Platelet Function Profiles in Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Taking Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Abstract: In DM patients with coronary artery disease taking maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, impaired renal function is associated with reduced clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects and a greater prevalence of HPPR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
118
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower quartile identified patients with HRPR 20. As Figure 5 showed, patients with OSA were more likely to have HRPR than those non‐OSA (33.8% versus 13.6%, P =0.012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lower quartile identified patients with HRPR 20. As Figure 5 showed, patients with OSA were more likely to have HRPR than those non‐OSA (33.8% versus 13.6%, P =0.012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The current study is the first to report such an association in the brain. Previous reports have evaluated patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease (20)(21)(22). For example, Park et al (20) investigated patients who underwent coronary angiography, coronary vascular intervention or peripheral vascular intervention and measured platelet aggregation using the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay in 23 normal renal function patients receiving 75 mg/ day of clopidogrel, 18 CKD patients receiving 75 mg/day of clopidogrel and 18 CKD patients receiving 150 mg/day of clopidogrel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another crossover study, the addition of aspirin (325 mg daily) to cilostazol (100 mg twice a day) did not enhance the inhibition of AAinduced platelet aggregation compared with cilostazol alone (p = 0.38) 30) , implying the potential inhibition by cilostazol of thromboxane receptor-mediated platelet aggregation. Recent studies have also demonstrated that patients with high platelet reactivity (HPR) to multiple agonists are more susceptible to clinical events than those with HPR to any isolated agonists 31,32) . Therefore, the pharmacodynamic effects and clinical benefits of adjunctive cilostazol may be underestimated when ADP is used as the sole platelet agonist to evaluate the platelet function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%