2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of check dam series on coarse sediment connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of cascading weirs has also been studied by Martín‐Vide and Andreatta (2009), Galia et al. (2016, 2021), and Korpak et al. (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of cascading weirs has also been studied by Martín‐Vide and Andreatta (2009), Galia et al. (2016, 2021), and Korpak et al. (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our simulation with cascading weirs shows that the largest degradation occurs at Weir 3, due to the long interval between Weir 3 and the next weir downstream. The effect of cascading weirs has also been studied by Martín-Vide and Andreatta (2009), Galia et al (2016Galia et al ( , 2021, and Korpak et al (2021). In their studies, the intervals between weirs are relatively small (dozens to hundreds of meters), and the weirs are distributed uniformly.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our values were even slightly higher. This may be an effect of bed armoring, that can act as a booster of longitudinal sediment transport because vertical exchange of particles between sedimentary layers is more difficult in armored rivers (Galia et al., 2021). Bed armoring could also explain the lack of size‐selective transport during the first displacement after particle seeding (Figure 12), since the median sizes of the tracers (41 mm) and the augmented gravel (22 mm) were much smaller than the median size of the riverbed (80 mm), and particles were not yet imbricated into the bed structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Luo et al [96], although in a different climatic and geomorphological context (a restored small catchment in Loess Plateau, China), reported that check dams were less effective in reducing water and sediment flows than revegetation and terraces, which instead determined significantly lower unit soil loss compared to an unregulated catchment. Galia et al [97], in regulated catchments in the Czech Republic, demonstrated that torrent control works increased the longitudinal connectivity of sediments compared to unregulated channels with the same catchment-scale characteristics. This contrasted the general perception of check dams as decelerators of erosion, showing that sequences of consolidation check dams (as in our study) in small regulated channels can increase sediment flows downstream.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Sediment Yield Between The Regulated (Vacale) And Unregulated (Serra) Torrentsmentioning
confidence: 99%