2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00291.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of changes in viral marker screening assays

Abstract: Introduction of newly licensed versions of assays, switching kit manufacturers, and lot-to-lot variations have an impact on rates of deferrals of safe donors as well as sensitivity of routine screening. Before considering changes in screening tests, blood centers should be aware of, and evaluate, the potential impact on donor loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported confirmation rates for HBV in developed countries are 34% (92) and 38.8% (49); the latter rate was selected for use here. The confirmation rate selected for HCV was 50%, consistent with the median of what has been previously reported (49,92,94,106), and the confirmation rate selected for T. cruzi was 25% (31). Calculations for HIV were also adjusted on the basis of a report from Southern Brazil, with case confirmation similar to that mentioned above, indicating an estimated residual risk of 1 in 50,000 because of the window period (36).…”
Section: Vol 18 2005 Transfusion-transmitted Infectious Diseases 21supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported confirmation rates for HBV in developed countries are 34% (92) and 38.8% (49); the latter rate was selected for use here. The confirmation rate selected for HCV was 50%, consistent with the median of what has been previously reported (49,92,94,106), and the confirmation rate selected for T. cruzi was 25% (31). Calculations for HIV were also adjusted on the basis of a report from Southern Brazil, with case confirmation similar to that mentioned above, indicating an estimated residual risk of 1 in 50,000 because of the window period (36).…”
Section: Vol 18 2005 Transfusion-transmitted Infectious Diseases 21supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Confirmation rates for HIV in developed countries, where repeat donors are the norm, are usually less than 10% (49,95). To put our estimates for developing countries in Latin America in a proper perspective, we used a confirmation rate of 16%, the rate which has been found among, first-time blood donors in the United States (92). The reported confirmation rates for HBV in developed countries are 34% (92) and 38.8% (49); the latter rate was selected for use here.…”
Section: Vol 18 2005 Transfusion-transmitted Infectious Diseases 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, introduction of the modified version will have clear benefits for both, users and donors. During the 1990s, several reports have raised concerns over the false-positive rates of some screening tests (Sharma et al, 2003). As shown in this study by the ARCHITECT Anti-HCV false-reactive panel, the modification of the assay diluent decreases the number of false-reactive specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…An increase in screening test sensitivity of TTIs is highly desirable to ensure recipient safety. However, in populations with a low prevalence rate, the positive predictive value is relatively poor [31-33]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%