2002
DOI: 10.1002/bit.10366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of cell culture process changes on endogenous retrovirus expression

Abstract: Cell culture process changes (e.g., changes in scale, medium formulation, operational conditions) and cell line changes are common during the development life cycle of a therapeutic protein. To ensure that the impact of such process changes on product quality and safety is minimal, it is standard practice to compare critical product quality and safety attributes before and after the changes. One potential concern introduced by cell culture process improvements is the possibility of increased endogenous retrovi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimates were 0.20 log 10 for feedstock, 0.13 log 10 for load density, 0.12 log 10 for load flow rate, and −0.05 log 10 for operating temperature, all well within the experimental variation, which includes at least the variations from chromatography, sampling and QPCR assays. In addition, LRV variation is dependent on the measurements of two samples (load and pool), and the estimates observed in this study were even lower than the assay variation for a single measurement, at 0.2–0.5 log 10 (Brorson et al, ). Therefore, no practically significant effect on RVLP removal was observed within the tested ranges of the five parameters studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The estimates were 0.20 log 10 for feedstock, 0.13 log 10 for load density, 0.12 log 10 for load flow rate, and −0.05 log 10 for operating temperature, all well within the experimental variation, which includes at least the variations from chromatography, sampling and QPCR assays. In addition, LRV variation is dependent on the measurements of two samples (load and pool), and the estimates observed in this study were even lower than the assay variation for a single measurement, at 0.2–0.5 log 10 (Brorson et al, ). Therefore, no practically significant effect on RVLP removal was observed within the tested ranges of the five parameters studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…For example, CHO retrovirus load is cell line dependent and to some extent cell culture process dependent (Brorson et al, 2002a). Thus, the application of a modular approach for protein A chromatography is a larger technical challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this mechanistic understanding of an important viral clearance process provides the Introduction Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly produced recombinantly using mammalian cell cultures, and therefore must be purified from cellular impurities such as host cell proteins and DNA, process-related impurities, and potential contaminants that could be introduced during production. Processes utilizing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and other mammalian cells are known to contain non-infectious retrovirus-like particles (RVLPs) (Anderson et al, 1991;Brorson et al, 2002;Lieber et al, 1973), and there also is a potential for adventitious viruses to be introduced during cell culture (Garnick, 1996). In order to ensure safety of the products and to comply with regulatory requirements, the mAb purification process must be capable of removing or inactivating any viral impurities which could be present (CBER, 1997;EMEA, 2008;ICH, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%