2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on All-Cause and Disease-Specific Mortality: Advances Since 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
241
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
12
241
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the past several decades daily physical activity, both at work and during leisure time, has declined. The impact of a population doing less and less physically demanding activities, thereby increasing inactivity time, has obvious and well‐documented health consequences with increased risks for cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the past several decades daily physical activity, both at work and during leisure time, has declined. The impact of a population doing less and less physically demanding activities, thereby increasing inactivity time, has obvious and well‐documented health consequences with increased risks for cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is as a strong, independent predictor of all-cause and disease-specific mortality17 and high level of CRF is associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, in both rats18 and humans 19 20. It has previously been widely reported that former athletes have lower morbidity and mortality compared with general population,12 which may be due to their genetic background, increased PA levels or other better health habits 7 8 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, even though we provided a list of apps currently available in app markets, it is important to note that the volume and turnover of apps are high; thus, it is likely that new applications will appear while others assessed in the current analysis will be defunct in the near future. The strengths of our review include a comprehensive analysis and discussion concerning the opportunities that apps provide for the objective and remote assessment of CRF and their usefulness for clinical and sports/training purposes [16, 810]. Specifically, our review contributes to the field by providing (1) information on the validity and reliability of apps currently available in the scientific literature; (2) a comprehensive list of apps currently available in app markets, including a qualitative rating of each in order to assist readers with selection of the best apps (Supplemental Tables 6–9 in the ESM, which include a direct link to each app); (3) a list of the key characteristics that a fitness app should have in order to assist readers with the selection of apps, as well as app developers to design better apps in the future; and (4) a list of recommendations for future research directions based on knowledge gaps identified during this systematic review.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a powerful marker of cardiovascular (CV) health [16]. Despite the strong existing evidence linking CRF to CV health, the recent eHealth tools developed to assess CV disease (CVD) risk on the basis of multiple risk factors does not include CRF as a measure [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%