2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of carbon emission constraint on design of small scale multi-energy system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steady-state operation of an EDN is represented by the set of equations (2)- (5). The active and reactive power balance is shown in (2) and 3, respectively. The voltage magnitude drop at the circuit mn is determined by using (4), while (5) defines the square of the current flow magnitude at circuit mn, considering the square of the active and reactive power flows and the voltage magnitude.…”
Section: Non-convex Programming Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady-state operation of an EDN is represented by the set of equations (2)- (5). The active and reactive power balance is shown in (2) and 3, respectively. The voltage magnitude drop at the circuit mn is determined by using (4), while (5) defines the square of the current flow magnitude at circuit mn, considering the square of the active and reactive power flows and the voltage magnitude.…”
Section: Non-convex Programming Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering carbon emissions as an additional objective to be minimized creates a Pareto frontier of solutions which trade off emissions reductions for cost increases, and vice versa. The full Pareto frontier of cost and emissions can be sampled using the -constraint method [8], [10], [11], or if the set of potential technologies is small, the results for all combinations can be explicitly calculated [9]. Evins [7] presents a multi-level model where building and energy hub variables are optimized in the upper-level while operation variables (including binary variables for fuel cell status) are optimized in the lower level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picard and Helsen [9] evaluate only a limited number of possible equipment combinations in order to be able to evaluate all of their costs and emissions. Several authors [8], [10], [11] build MILP models, but without an independent operator. Therefore the derived solutions could satisfy the emissions constraints, but may not in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy conversion and coupling relationship are separately described for each device and energy carrier, with obvious an distinction compared to the EH concept, which is utilized to establish the relationship of the whole system from a global perspective. The device models for photovoltaic (PV), electrical energy storage (ESS), combined heat and power (CHP) plant, gas boiler (GB), heat pump (HP), and thermal energy storage (TES) have been developed with input-output characteristics, capacity constraints, ramp rate limits and other conditions [9]. In addition, models for each energy carrier (electricity, gas, and heat) have been proposed based on the energy balance principle in the MECS [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device models for photovoltaic (PV), electrical energy storage (ESS), combined heat and power (CHP) plant, gas boiler (GB), heat pump (HP), and thermal energy storage (TES) have been developed with input-output characteristics, capacity constraints, ramp rate limits and other conditions [9]. In addition, models for each energy carrier (electricity, gas, and heat) have been proposed based on the energy balance principle in the MECS [9,10]. Based on MECS modeling, many scholars have focused on optimal operation strategy to realize rational energy distribution and efficient energy management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%