2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature11432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study

Abstract: Life extension by calorie restriction (CR) has been widely reported in a variety of species and remains on the forefront of anti-aging intervention studies. We report healthspan and survival effects of CR from a 23-year study in rhesus macaques conducted at the National Institute on Aging (NIA). CR initiated at older ages did not increase survival relative to Controls; however, CR monkeys demonstrated an improved metabolic profile and may have less oxidative stress as indicated by plasma isoprostane levels. Wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
728
6
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 984 publications
(778 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
18
728
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were also major differences in the results of these studies, including the fact that one found that DR reduces mortality, whereas the other did not (46,47) . Interestingly, a recent report (48) now suggests that in the National Institute on Aging study (47) control animals might in fact have been undergoing DR which would explain why DR did not have a greater impact in that study. Some of these discrepancies might stem from differences in experimental design, including differences in food composition and the genetic origin of the animals.…”
Section: Dietary Restriction and 'Genotype By Environment' Interactiomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, there were also major differences in the results of these studies, including the fact that one found that DR reduces mortality, whereas the other did not (46,47) . Interestingly, a recent report (48) now suggests that in the National Institute on Aging study (47) control animals might in fact have been undergoing DR which would explain why DR did not have a greater impact in that study. Some of these discrepancies might stem from differences in experimental design, including differences in food composition and the genetic origin of the animals.…”
Section: Dietary Restriction and 'Genotype By Environment' Interactiomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Accordingly, genetic polymorphisms/mutations that cause loss of function of GH, IGF‐1 receptor, insulin receptor or its downstream factors, have been implicated in human longevity as in model organisms (Fontana et al ., 2010; Kenyon, 2010b; Tazearslan et al ., 2011; Barzilai et al ., 2012; Milman et al ., 2014). Dietary restriction is a well‐known environmental signal shown to expand lifespan in eukaryote species, from yeast to primates (Colman et al ., 2009; Fontana et al ., 2010; Mattison et al ., 2012). The “longevity response” to dietary restriction is regulated by several nutrient‐sensing pathways: the kinase TOR, AMP kinase, sirtuins, and the IIS (Kenyon, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the reduction of calorie intake without malnutrition, also known as calorie restriction (CR), has been shown to be the most robust nongenetic or pharmacological approach to study this phenomenon (Weindruch & Walford, 1988). A reduction in calorie intake (typically 20–40% of the ad libitum fed controls) has been reported to increase lifespan and to prevent cancer, diabetes, hypertension, and other age‐related diseases in a wide range of animals, including non‐human primates and humans (Colman et al ., 2009; Mattison et al ., 2012). Although the mechanisms by which CR operates are not completely understood, it is often assumed that the anti‐aging action of CR is partially based on its ability to suppress oxidative stress and maintain the cellular redox status to provide optimal cell signaling processes and normal gene expression (Chung et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%