2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of boron doping profiles on the specific contact resistance of screen printed Ag–Al contacts on silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different sizes of crystallite imprints can be observed; however, their estimated maximum penetration depths are less than about 80 nm. Hence, they are significantly smaller in size then those commonly observed for Ag‐Al contacts . Apparently, the number of imprints is significantly larger for the sample in Figure (a), which shows the lower ρ C ≈ 1.5 mΩ cm 2 in comparison with the sample in Figure (b) with the higher ρ C ≈ 7.5 mΩ cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different sizes of crystallite imprints can be observed; however, their estimated maximum penetration depths are less than about 80 nm. Hence, they are significantly smaller in size then those commonly observed for Ag‐Al contacts . Apparently, the number of imprints is significantly larger for the sample in Figure (a), which shows the lower ρ C ≈ 1.5 mΩ cm 2 in comparison with the sample in Figure (b) with the higher ρ C ≈ 7.5 mΩ cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…. It was shown that these Ag‐Al contacts feature large and deep metal crystallites at the interface between the bulk of the Ag‐Al contact and the boron‐doped surface . These metal crystallites reach depths of up to a few microns and are supposed to be the origin of the observed enhanced charge carrier recombination activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…16,17 But due to the large doping level in the Si emitters, analytical models still predict a relatively small contact resistivity of ∼2x10 -5 Ω.cm 2 , when the doping level is ∼3x10 19 cm -3 . 13 Therefore the large contact resistivity for Ag fritless pastes contacting both wafers was unexpected, because the doping level of both kinds of emitters are quite high, in the range of 10 19 -10 20 cm -3 . Here we think it is quite possible that there is a highly insulating thin thermal SiO 2 layer generated on the surfaces of the emitter during the firing process, and therefore the contact resistance is determined by the metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frits etch the silicon nitride (SiN x ) at high firing temperatures and form a non-homogeneous interfacial glass layer that creates a complex microstructure at the interface between the Ag contact and the Si emitters. [8][9][10][11][12][13] In this work, a fritless silver paste is used to avoid the formation of an interfacial glass layer below the Ag line which would complicate analysis of Al's effect on the Si surface and Si/Ag interfacial microstructure. Developing a fundamental understanding on the role of Al in improving the electrical contact is necessary in order to find alternative additives to replace or modify Al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On group 2 wafers slightly lower contact resistances are obtained compared to the values for paste Ag1 and Ag2 of group 1 fired at 840 °C. This is very likely due to the influence of differences in the emitter parameters on contact resistance . Typical ϱ c values for commercially available Al‐containing Ag screen‐printing pastes on wafers processed like the samples of group 2 lie between 2 mΩ cm 2 and 4 mΩ cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%