1992
DOI: 10.3354/meps089253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of bioroughness on interfacia solute exchange in permeable sediments

Abstract: We demonstrate the contribution of biogenic sediment microtopography, termed bioroughness, comprising all surface relief created by benthic organisms, on interfacial solute fluxes in permeable beds. Rhodamine-WT dye injected in sandy intertidal sediments revealed strong advective porewater replacement down to 5 cm sediment depth caused by small aggregates of mussel shells exposed to boundary layer flows. In a set of laboratory flume experiments we quantify the impact of various types of bioroughness elements o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
205
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
205
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Uptake down to 6 cm sediment depth was found after 132 h. One possible explanation for this transport is advective porewater flow, although at our station with a permeability of 3.029/1.66 )/ 10 (12 m 2 , advection should only cause transport down to 2 cm into the sediment (Huettel & Gust 1992). Recent results from Janssen et al (2005) using the in situ chamber system Sandy at the same station suggest that it is even less likely that advection is the predominant transport process at our station.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uptake down to 6 cm sediment depth was found after 132 h. One possible explanation for this transport is advective porewater flow, although at our station with a permeability of 3.029/1.66 )/ 10 (12 m 2 , advection should only cause transport down to 2 cm into the sediment (Huettel & Gust 1992). Recent results from Janssen et al (2005) using the in situ chamber system Sandy at the same station suggest that it is even less likely that advection is the predominant transport process at our station.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The amount of carbon added to each chamber corresponded to 0.31 g C m (2 (HE 145) and 0.36 g C m (2 (HE 148). The experiments were performed in the dark in acrylic cylindrical chambers (Huettel & Gust 1992), 20 cm in diameter and 31 cm in height. A horizontal disk stirred a water column of approximately 10 cm height at 20 rpm.…”
Section: Sites and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Petri dish was filled with natural seawater of reduced salinity (to about 26) and contained >30 individuals. The friction velocity at the bottom of the Petri dish was adjusted to 0.2 cm s − 1 by measuring particle movement over the bottom and directing an air jet onto the water surface, to emulate natural flow conditions of tidal flat sediment surfaces (Huettel and Gust, 1992;Shimeta et al, 2001). Temperature and pH (total scale) in the bulk seawater were measured using a micro-thermometer and a handheld pH meter (WTW pH 330i), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically driven pore water flow may result from wave action leading to oscillatory pressure fields and currents (Riedl et al, 1972;Precht and Huettel, 2003) or from unidirectional bottom currents interacting with the topography of the sediment-water interface (Thibodeaux and Boyle, 1987). This bottom topography may have a pure physical origin, such as sand ripples induced by currents, or can be created by biology, such as the pits and sediment mounds of various benthic organisms, like mud shrimp, lugworms and rays (Huettel and Gust, 1992b;Ziebis et al, 1996). Yet, pore water flow may also be directly induced by burrowing organisms, a process typically referred to as bio-irrigation (Aller, 2001;Meysman et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%