2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of binocular integrated visual field defects on healthy related quality of life in glaucoma

Abstract: To investigate the impact of different types of binocular integrated visual field defects on the quality of life in glaucoma. Ninety-six patients with primary glaucoma were divided into 5 groups with 25, 24, 11, 15, and 21 patients according to types of the binocular integrated visual field (BVF) defects. The criteria for BVF grouping included mild visual field defect in binocular eyes, mild visual field defect in 1 eye and moderate or advanced defect in the other, moderate and non-overlapping visu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean scores of the four GQL-15 subscales, namely, “Central and Near vision”, “Outdoor mobility”, “Peripheral vision” and “Glare and Dark adaptation” were 46.76, 45.61, 44.31 and 51.95 respectively, indicating that, greater difficulties were noted in the glare and dark adaptation domain. This pattern was supported by previous reports of studies conducted in Ethiopia, 13 Nigeria, 23 India, 24 China, 14 , 22 and Australia. 26 The possible justification for such a pattern might be because glare sensitivity is one of the biggest side effects of glaucoma-related fear of light resulting from the intra-ocular pressure rise in the eye.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean scores of the four GQL-15 subscales, namely, “Central and Near vision”, “Outdoor mobility”, “Peripheral vision” and “Glare and Dark adaptation” were 46.76, 45.61, 44.31 and 51.95 respectively, indicating that, greater difficulties were noted in the glare and dark adaptation domain. This pattern was supported by previous reports of studies conducted in Ethiopia, 13 Nigeria, 23 India, 24 China, 14 , 22 and Australia. 26 The possible justification for such a pattern might be because glare sensitivity is one of the biggest side effects of glaucoma-related fear of light resulting from the intra-ocular pressure rise in the eye.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The finding was consistent with that of previously conducted in Gondar, Ethiopia, 13 46.3. However, the finding was higher denoting poorer VRQOL, compared to the findings of the previous studies conducted in Nigeria, 24.07, 23 India, 26.0, 24 China; 26.0, 25 28.79, 14 and 31.86, 22 Australia, 30.5, 26 England, 22.09 19 and the Netherlands, 28. 27 These discrepancies may be explained by various factors including variation in the socio-economic and clinical characteristics of the study participants, sampling methods, and inclusion and exclusion criteria used by the studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of reports on glaucoma patients have described difficulties in performing daily activities and loss of vision-related quality of life [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Loss of binocular visual field (VF) and central best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) have been shown to be major factors leading to reduced quality of life in glaucoma [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, there is a gap in studies that take on a comprehensive approach to the VRQoL impairment in glaucoma. Previous studies examined certain aspects that might be associated with VRQoL in glaucoma, such as knowledge about glaucoma 7 and health literacy , 8 psychological factors 9 visual impairment , 10 visual field defects , 11 glaucoma-specific medications 12 and interventions 13,14 or environmental conditions. 15 Other studies examined multiple factors affecting VRQoL in patient with glaucoma , [16][17][18][19] however, they did not include an analysis of interventions or glaucoma subtype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%