Impact of bilateral investment treaties on foreign direct investment in Africa

Abstract

Africa continues to face several challenges that make its share of global foreign direct investment (FDI) to be infinitesimal. These include the prevalence of fragmented investment policies, information asymmetry and high sovereign risk. Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) can help overcome some of these encumbrances by signalling the host country's willingness to protect FDIs. This study hypothesizes that BITs can play an augmentation role and investigates their impact on FDI attraction using data across 48 African countries from 2000 to 2018. In contrast to the previous theoretical and most empirical literature, results based on the two-step systems generalized method of moments (GMM) show that ratified BITs do not perform a significant role in FDI attraction. Nonetheless, the additional analyses allowed us to make some rather non-trivial conclusions about the possible effects of BITs concluded with France on FDI. The study recommends that countries should participate in some BITs, although governments need to be cautious when tying their hands with BITs because of susceptibility to damaging litigations that sometimes follow, irrespective of the less than commensurate benefits.

Globalisation and economic growth in Africa: New evidence from the past two decades

“…Similarly, static models such as fixed and random effects (FE/RE) assume strict exogeneity, that is, a country's globalisation and other macroeconomic fundamentals that affect economic growth are orthogonal. However, most cross-sectional time-series variables suffer from simultaneity and endogeneity (Beri & Nubong 2022). Simultaneity bias often happens when the evolution of globalisation does stimulate economic growth.…”

“…All models account for time-fixed effects to capture, among others: (1) changes in growth in all countries in specific years (Schularick & Solomou 2011), (2) ensure mean reversion of growth over time and, (3) account for unobserved or inaccurately observed components of the economic environment, such as the investment climate and regulations that affect economic growth (Beri & Nubong 2021, 2022.…”

Economic globalisation and labour market outcomes in Africa

“…Forty-one African countries 1 are under scrutiny, and data availability is the main criterion for retaining a country. I employed the hyperbolic sine transformation given by the formula 𝑥 = ln[𝑥 + √(𝑥 2 + 1)] to generate missing observations (Beri & Nubong, 2021). The following variables are selected for further scrutiny:…”

“…Economic globalisation is expected to cause positive changes in production, labour and capital markets that stimulate disparate effects on growth, income inequalities, factor demands and income shares (Santos & Simões, 2021;Van Treeck & Wacker, 2020). It became a catchword in Africa during the 1990s because of its perceived role in incentivising FDI, integrating labour markets, and the transfer of technology and innovations that augment economic growth (Beri & Nubong, 2021). It has also been linked with the redeployment of factors of production from one sector to another, a process that causes some unemployment, redundancy and even opens workers to new wages (Easton, 2002).…”

On the allocation puzzle and capital flows: Evidence from foreign direct investment and real sector growth in Africa

“…The literature is inconclusive about any bi‐directional association between economic growth and FDI (Kholdy & Sohrabian, 2005; Luca & Spatafora, 2012), not to mention FDI and real sector growth. Although Beri and Nubong (2021) notes that Africa's share of global FDI remains infinitesimal, the focus on FDI and Africa is necessary as such flows have helped most African countries to move away from being heavily dependent on aid and natural resource endowment. Ernst and Young (2013) show the FDI has in the past created almost 1.6 million jobs on the continent.…”