Impact of being primed with social deception upon observer responses to others’ pain

Abstract

This study examined whether priming with social deception affects responses (pain estimates, self-reported sympathy, inclination to help) towards others' pain. We further explored whether the priming effect is mediated by the valence of the patients (positive/negative), as indicated by the participants. First, participants (N=55) took part in an 'independent' delayed memory study in which they read either a neutral text about the use of the health care system (neutral condition) or a text about its misuse (social deception condition). Second, participants watched videos of pain patients performing pain-inducing activities. Participants rated the patients' pain, the sympathy felt for the patients and the inclination to help the patients. Third, the participants re-estimated patients' pain when patients' self-report of pain was provided.Fourth, pictures of the patients were shown and participants indicated the valence of the patients (positive/negative). Results revealed no direct effect of priming with social deception.However, priming with social deception was related to less positive rating of the valence of the patients, that were related to lower ratings on pain and sympathy, and to larger discrepancies between the ratings of the patients and the observers. The results indicate that observers attribute less pain, feel less sympathy and take patients' self-reported pain intensity less into account when the patients are evaluated less positively, which is likely to occur when a cognitive scheme of social deception is primed.Note: This is an uncorrected version of an author's manuscript accepted for publication.Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication. During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered that could affect the content.

The Effect of Perceived Injustice on Appraisals of Physical Activity: An Examination of the Mediating Role of Attention Bias to Pain in a Chronic Low Back Pain Sample

“…The current study is the first to examine the association between perceived injustice and in-vivo appraisals of pain and difficulty in response to common physical tasks (or in a sample composed exclusively of individuals with chronic low back pain). As noted, these tasks were modeled after an established paradigm [8][9][10] and purposefully chosen to extend the ecological validity of existing studies.…”

“…The order of movement performance did not vary across participants. The selection of these movements is modeled after De Ruddere and colleagues [8][9][10] and based upon previous findings indicating that these routine daily tasks require movement that is usually sufficient to increase pain and to elicit pain behaviour [25]. The experimenter provided instruction (without modeling) regarding performance of each movement (e.g.…”

Examining Affective-Motivational Dynamics and Behavioral Implications Within The Interpersonal Context of Pain

“…), and potential mechanisms of action. unfairness of the pain experience, and prejudicial/discriminatory beliefs or attitudes [3,18,19,20,40,87]. Type of relationship between pain observer and sufferer is likely important here.…”

Discounting pain in the absence of medical evidence is explained by negative evaluation of the patient

“…Additionally, there is preliminary evidence for the role of negative evaluation of the patient in the process of estimating a patient"s pain where there is no clear medical evidence [41]. De Ruddere and colleagues [10,11] found that observer negative evaluations of patients appear to generate lower observer pain estimates.…”