2020
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Behavioral Health Homes on Cost and Utilization Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have been specific to individual conditions within controlled research settings. [10][11][12]23,24 Our findings suggest that promoting OPBHT as part of a population health strategy is associated with improved overall medical spending, particularly among adults. Future research should validate these findings in other populations, including government-insured individuals, and explore data by chronic disease category, over longer time horizons, by type and quality of OPBHT, by type of medical spending, within subpopulations with BHCs, and including virtual and digital behavioral health services.…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have been specific to individual conditions within controlled research settings. [10][11][12]23,24 Our findings suggest that promoting OPBHT as part of a population health strategy is associated with improved overall medical spending, particularly among adults. Future research should validate these findings in other populations, including government-insured individuals, and explore data by chronic disease category, over longer time horizons, by type and quality of OPBHT, by type of medical spending, within subpopulations with BHCs, and including virtual and digital behavioral health services.…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1 Individuals with a BHC incur 2.8 to 6.2 times greater medical costs than those without a BHC, which could be explained in part by linkages between mental health conditions and highly prevalent chronic conditions. [2][3][4][5][6][7] While widescale cost-effectiveness of interventions developed to treat BHCs and also improve medical health outcomes has not been established, 8,9 several promising studies have indicated statistically significant medical cost savings associated with improved antidepressant adherence, 10 use of behavioral health homes, 11 and substance use interventions. 12 Despite this evidence, diagnosis of BHCs is often delayed 13 and the majority of the population with a BHC receives little to no treatment in any given year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have gone so far as to build behavioral health homes for SMI patients, a form of reverse integration where components of medical care are embedded into a unit focused on serious mental health needs. [5][6][7] Despite these advances in our conceptual knowledge, given the numerous design options and management decisions necessary to create functioning integrated mental health services, the implementation handbook remains comparatively thin. 8,9 Understanding this broader context and current trends toward integrated mental health care delivery may be the easiest part.…”
Section: All Of This Requires Design Input and Clinical Backup From Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the more specialized services required for moderate to severe mental illness go well beyond what the typical integrated primary setting can offer. Some have gone so far as to build behavioral health homes for SMI patients, a form of reverse integration where components of medical care are embedded into a unit focused on serious mental health needs 5‐7 . Despite these advances in our conceptual knowledge, given the numerous design options and management decisions necessary to create functioning integrated mental health services, the implementation handbook remains comparatively thin 8,9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, at the time of this report, the financial impact of COVID-19-related mandates on many smaller, community-based MH centers is unknown but expected to strain limited resources and state Medicaid budgets (Garrett & Gangopadhyaya, 2020). As a result, managed care organizations look to practical strategies that address SDoH while decreasing high-cost, acute service utilization (such as inpatient MH and SUD treatment and withdrawal management) and linking individuals to ambulatory care as a secondary prevention effort (Brar et al, 2021;Gottlieb et al, 2016Gottlieb et al, , 2017Highland et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%