2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Baryonic Processes on Weak-Lensing Cosmology: Power Spectrum, Nonlocal Statistics, and Parameter Bias

Abstract: We study the impact of baryonic physics on cosmological parameter estimation with weak-lensing surveys. We run a set of cosmological hydrodynamics simulations with different galaxy formation models. We then perform raytracing simulations through the total matter density field to generate 100 independent convergence maps with a field of view of 25 deg 2 , and we use them to examine the ability of the following three lensing statistics as cosmological probes:power spectrum (PS), peak counts, and Minkowski funct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(122 reference statements)
4
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, including the feedback of supernovae, stars and AGNs, Osato et al (2015) find that the feedback effects can effectively reduce the mass of small DM haloes, eventually reducing the number of low-SNR WL peaks. Because of the smaller impact of feedback on the massive DM haloes (Velliscig et al 2014), the high-SNR peak number is not significantly changed.…”
Section: Baryonic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, including the feedback of supernovae, stars and AGNs, Osato et al (2015) find that the feedback effects can effectively reduce the mass of small DM haloes, eventually reducing the number of low-SNR WL peaks. Because of the smaller impact of feedback on the massive DM haloes (Velliscig et al 2014), the high-SNR peak number is not significantly changed.…”
Section: Baryonic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, most of the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) peaks are usually not associated with a dominant halo, and are instead generated by the projection of LSS along the LOS. Even for high-SNR peaks where the correspondence with massive haloes is clearly seen, many systematic effects, such as the shape noise contamination from the intrinsic ellipticities of source galaxies, the boost factor due to the member contamination and the blending in cluster regions, baryonic effects, the projection effects of LSS, and intrinsic alignments (IA), can complicate WL peak analysis (Tang & Fan 2005;Yang et al 2011Yang et al , 2013Hamana et al 2012;Fu & Fan 2014;Osato et al 2015;Kacprzak et al 2016;Liu & Haiman 2016;Yuan et al 2017). These can generate non-halo-associated peaks and also alter the significance of the peaks from DM haloes, thus affecting WL peak statistics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGN feedback also suppresses the number density of halos by a few tens of a percent at M 10 14 M ⊙ (Vogelsberger et al 2014a). Current and future weak-lensing surveys will detect such baryonic effects via the shear correlation functions, convergence peak counts, or Minkowski functionals (e.g., Semboloni et al 2011;Osato et al 2015). These baryonic effects on the matter power spectrum can be taken into account using the fitting formula given by .…”
Section: Known Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [9,34] studied the impact of baryonic physics on peaks, which can change the matter distribution inside dark matter halos through radiative cooling and feedback. Our findings are consistent with Y11 and suggest that low peaks may be less affected by baryonic processes, which may be confined to the inner regions of the halo ( [17], although see [18] that AGN feedback can impact the gas distribution out to the virial radius and beyond).…”
Section: Halo Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%