2006
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2005.862429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of backreflection on upstream transmission in WDM single-fiber loopback access networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the link is vulnerable to parasitic reflections caused either by bad fiber connections or by Rayleigh reflection in the optical fiber. This reflected signal induces beat noise against the intended signal at the receiver [25]. Figure 15(a) shows the test setup for characterizing the effect of reflection on transmission quality.…”
Section: Reflection Sensitivity In the Re-modulation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the link is vulnerable to parasitic reflections caused either by bad fiber connections or by Rayleigh reflection in the optical fiber. This reflected signal induces beat noise against the intended signal at the receiver [25]. Figure 15(a) shows the test setup for characterizing the effect of reflection on transmission quality.…”
Section: Reflection Sensitivity In the Re-modulation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15(b) shows the setup for emulating reflection on the link. The magnitude of link reflection is able to be controlled with the variable attenuator, whereas polarization states of the reflected light being controlled with the polarization controller [25]. In the figure, R1 is the reflection of the downstream optical signal toward the OLT side, and R2 is the reflection of the upstream signal toward the ONU side.…”
Section: Reflection Sensitivity In the Re-modulation Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrier is constant about -34dB, depending the fiber coefficient [5]. Reflections interference happened if there is a discontinuity in the link of transmission system.…”
Section: Rbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we apply the same procedure as for in (4)-(11) to the signal given by the above formula, we obtain an expression for the interferometric noise component of the photocurrent (19) If a sine-shape signal is applied to modulate the phase at the source, the expression describing phase deviation at the phase modulator is given as follows: where is the modulation index and is the frequency of the phase modulating signal. When the above is taken into account together with the assumption that the phase changes induced in the RSOA are negligible with respect to the external phase modulation, we can modify the (19) to the following: (21) Applying the same condition as in (16) to the phase deviation induced by the phase modulator gives the formula below (22) The result after solving (22) shows the relation of modulation index to the frequency of phase modulating signal, Fig. 6 (RSOA ).…”
Section: Coherent Crosstalk and External Phase Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%