2016
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of axial root growth angles on nitrogen acquisition in maize depends on environmental conditions

Abstract: Results support the hypothesis that root growth angles are primary determinants of N acquisition in maize. With decreasing soil N status, optimal angles resulted in 15-50 % greater N acquisition over 42 d. Optimal root phenotypes for N capture varied with soil and precipitation regimes, suggesting that genetic selection for root phenotypes could be tailored to specific environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RCS may interact with growth angle or other phenes that affect the placement of roots in different soil domains. In some nitrogen regimes, a steep growth angle increases nitrogen capture (Trachsel et al 2013;Dathe et al 2016) and its interaction with RCS may enable the deep placement of roots in soil to capture mobile nutrients. Phene synergisms are important drivers in evolution and plant adaptation and have strong interactions with environmental conditions.…”
Section: Synergisms With Other Plant Phenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RCS may interact with growth angle or other phenes that affect the placement of roots in different soil domains. In some nitrogen regimes, a steep growth angle increases nitrogen capture (Trachsel et al 2013;Dathe et al 2016) and its interaction with RCS may enable the deep placement of roots in soil to capture mobile nutrients. Phene synergisms are important drivers in evolution and plant adaptation and have strong interactions with environmental conditions.…”
Section: Synergisms With Other Plant Phenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical phene states that reduce living cortical tissue reduce root respiration and nutrient content, thereby permitting greater resource allocation to other plant functions including growth and reproduction Lynch 2015). For example, the development of root cortical aerenchyma (RCA) in maize improves plant performance in environments with suboptimal nutrient and water availability (Zhu et al 2010;Postma and Lynch 2011a, b;Jaramillo et al 2013;Saengwilai et al 2014;Chimungu et al 2015), an effect which modeling studies show can be attributed to a reduction in root metabolic costs (Postma et al 2014;Dathe et al 2016). Fewer cell files or greater cell size in the root cortex of maize substantially reduces root respiration and improves soil exploration and water acquisition in conditions of suboptimal water availability (Chimungu et al 2014a(Chimungu et al , 2014b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies enable the evaluation of RCS in truly isophenic lines characterized by identical root and shoot phenotypes with a single contrasting phene state, permitting analysis of the effects attributed directly to that phene state, which is generally infeasible in empirical studies (Postma and Lynch, 2011b). SimRoot, a functional-structural plant model, also can simulate contrasting environments while holding the plant phenotype constant, which is challenging in empirical studies (Dathe et al, 2016). SimRoot results have been useful guides for subsequent empirical work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergisms also may exist with phenes that effect root placement in soil domains. For example, a steep growth angle increases nitrogen capture in some N regimes (Trachsel et al, 2013;Dathe et al, 2016). Phene synergisms show strong interactions with environmental conditions and, therefore, may be important drivers in evolution and should be considered in crop breeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A post‐simulation analysis of root geometry, nutrient uptake and carbon (C) costs enabled the comparison of different RSAs with respect to their efficiency in taking up phosphorus (P) relative to C costs (Nielsen et al ., 1994, 1997; Lynch & Beebe, 1995; Lynch et al ., 1997; Ge et al ., 2000; Rubio et al ., 2001; Walk et al ., 2004, 2006). Later versions coupled physiological mechanisms, such as root respiration, nutrient uptake, canopy photosynthesis and RSA, to simulate how the root phenotype dynamically interacts with the soil environment, and how this interaction influences the acquisition of soil resources and, consequently, plant growth (Postma & Lynch, 2011a,b, 2012; Dathe et al ., 2013, 2016; Postma et al ., 2014a; York et al ., 2016). The initial focus was on P capture (Lynch & Beebe, 1995; Ge et al ., 2000; Ma et al ., 2001; Postma & Lynch, 2011b), which was later expanded to include C (photosynthesis), nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and water (Postma et al ., 2008; Postma & Lynch, 2011a; Dathe et al ., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%